Search for: "Quick v. State" Results 501 - 520 of 4,929
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2010, 4:58 am by NL
The Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKSC 54 Just a quick note to confirm that the Supreme Court has unanimously upheld the Court of Appeal decision (reported here) that the Secretary of State cannot use common law claims to recover overpayments of social security benefits where the overpayment is by reason of acccident or error on the part of the benefit agency. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:58 am by NL
The Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKSC 54 Just a quick note to confirm that the Supreme Court has unanimously upheld the Court of Appeal decision (reported here) that the Secretary of State cannot use common law claims to recover overpayments of social security benefits where the overpayment is by reason of acccident or error on the part of the benefit agency. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 9:53 am by Eric Goldman
In any case, today’s pro se lawsuit, like numerous lawsuits preceding it, goes nowhere and gets a quick dismissal. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 8:36 am by Eric Goldman
More SESTA/FOSTA-Related Posts: * 2H 2020 Quick Links, Part 4 (FOSTA) * Justice Thomas’ Anti-Section 230 Statement Doesn’t Support Reconsideration–JB v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm by David Super
       By contrast, if a convention follows the ratification process under Article V, any change would require approval of thirty-eight state legislatures or state conventions. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:17 am by Eric Goldman
The pace of purchases was so great on fight night that the bout was delayed by about a half-hour to process the flurry of late orders. * Katz v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 4:39 am by Adam Wagner
Below is a quick rundown of the most recent links. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:57 am by Eric Goldman
Martono * 2H 2020 Quick Links, Part 4 (FOSTA) * Justice Thomas’ Anti-Section 230 Statement Doesn’t Support Reconsideration–JB v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
A quick recap: last summer, Texas passed HB20, a #MAGA messaging bill that poses existential threats to the Internet as we know it. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:59 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Pending that, I want to make a quick note of a very disturbing choice of words in the opinion. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 8:09 am by Eric Goldman
Martono * 2H 2020 Quick Links, Part 4 (FOSTA) * Justice Thomas’ Anti-Section 230 Statement Doesn’t Support Reconsideration–JB v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 6:00 am by Michael Risch
With the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 3:28 pm
” 2015 OHIO CASE PROTECTS LANDOWNERS On November 2, 2015, in the case of “City of Perrysburg v. [read post]