Search for: "R"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,061,432
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2016, 2:15 pm
[Chief executive Steve] Huffman said Wednesday that 'stickied' posts from r/the_Donald's moderators would no longer appear on r/all, at all... [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 4:07 pm
Wikipedia has R. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 10:06 am
James R. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 6:35 am
Par exemple : un résident de Floride n’est pas enregistré pour voter dans le Massachusetts; un résident de Floride n’a pas de permis de conduire du Michigan; un résident de Floride ne possède pas ou ne conduit pas une voiture enregistrée dans l’Ohio. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 5:53 pm
Pamela R. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:40 am
Ihnen soll es darum gegangen sein, selbst die Sicherheitskräfte für die Diskothek zu stellen. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 1:35 am
The Supreme Court heard the appeal in R v Golds on 14 June 2016, concerning the defence of diminished responsibility where a murder charge was at issue. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:19 am
Les résultats de l'EQF brevets 2010 sont publiés ici. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 6:37 am
“The Judge Edward R. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 1:55 am
Es hat sich bei der Rückabwicklung eines Vertrags nach Rücktritt infolge einer Vertragsverletzung bekanntlich für die Umwandlungstheorie entschieden (BGE 114 II 152; Kritik der Lehre in BGE 129 III 264 E. 4.1 zurückgewiesen). [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 12:35 pm
Quelques livres parus récemment :"La licence, instrument de régulation des droits de PI", par Alexandra Abello et Michel Vivant.Les Codes de la PI, édition 2009, chez Dalloz et Litecet en anglais, "Winning the Patent Damages Case", guide utile pour l'appréciation des dommages lors des litiges aux USA. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 2:36 pm
Charles R. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:05 am
While it's a safe bet that R. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 11:30 am
Using data on R&D... [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 2:00 am
R. (2022): The recent decision in R(BG and Anor) v Suffolk CC (‘Suffolk’) is a significant... [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 2:03 pm
Joel R. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
(i) This is precisely what happened in T 951/92 cited by the petitioner: the Board found that the ED had not acted in compliance with A 96 and A 97, R 51(3) EPC 1973 (A 94(3); R 71(2) EPC 2000), which require that any communication under A 94(3) EPC shall contain a reasoned statement covering, where appropriate, all the grounds against the grant of the European patent. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 3:27 pm
r. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 3:55 pm
Referendum Measure No. 71 (“R-71”) seeks to repeal Chapter 521, Washington Laws of 2009 (Expanding the rights and responsibilities of Washington State registered domestic partners). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:21 am
Die Referendumsfrist für das Bundesgesetz über die Buchpreisbindung (BuPG) endet am 7. [read post]
