Search for: "R. v. R." Results 501 - 520 of 145,126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2011, 9:39 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
The latest issue of the Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (Vol. 71, no. 4, 2011) is out. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
This was the question put squarely to the Alberta Court of Appeal in R v Mackie 2014 ABCA 221. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 1:46 am
R(AM)(Cameroon) v Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (No 2) , Secretary of State for the Home Department as interested party [2008] EWCA Civ 100; [2008] WLR (D) 57 “Where a statutory review of an immigration appeal mistakenly went ahead before a judicial review application establishing a good arguable case had been heard resulting in a final determination, that determination should be set aside and the judicial review proceed. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:41 am by CLARE MONTGOMERY QC
On 8 November 2017, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of John Haralambous (“JH”) in the case of R (Haralambous) v Crown Court at St Albans. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:03 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Clarke v R [2012] EWCA Crim 9 (20 January 2012) Oliver, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 3114 (21 December 2011) Lawrence, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 3129 (16 December 2011) Court of Appeal (Civi Division) Eastenders Cash & Carry Plc & Ors v HM Revenue & Customs [2012] EWCA Civ 15 (20 January 2012) Star Reefers Pool Inc v JFC Group Co Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 14 (20 January 2012) Charnock &… [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 11:56 pm by Tessa Buchanan
The post Case Comment: R (AA) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 49 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:14 am
R (Incorporated Trustees of the National Council on Ageing (Age Concern England)) v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Case C-388/07); [2009] WLR(D) 82 “National rules allowing compulsory dismissal at retirement age and non-recruitment of persons of retirement age were not contrary to Community law provided that they were justified by legitimate social [...] [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: The case of R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58Victim Fine Surcharges Today, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in four cases, heard together as R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am by INFORRM
” Lord Sumption distinguished the facts of Mr Catt’s appeal from those in MM v United Kingdom, and the decision of the Supreme Court in R (T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, in that: “[t]here has been no disclosure to third parties, and the prospect of future disclosure is limited by comprehensive restrictions. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:31 am by sally
R (Veolia ES Nottinghamshire Ltd) v Nottinghamshire County Council (Shlomo Dowen and The Audit Commission for Local Authorities and the National Health Service for England, interested parties) [2010] WLR (D) 273 “The right of ‘persons interested’ under section 15(1) of the Audit Commission Act 1998 to inspect the accounts to be audited and all books, deeds, contracts, bills, vouchers and receipts relating to them did not stretch, on the facts, to examination of… [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 7:05 am by Alex Bailin QC, Matrix
In R (Yam) v Central Criminal Court & Anor [2015] UKSC 76, [2016] AC 771 a seven judge Court considered the important issue of an individual’s right of access to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). [read post]