Search for: "ROBERT JACKSON" Results 501 - 520 of 3,804
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2023, 6:18 am
Leo, the executive vice president of the Federalist Society, asks the one that Robert Bork gave his most damaging answer to: "why do you want to be on the Supreme Court? [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:08 pm by Josh Blackman
And, indirectly at least, we will gain a peak at the cert pool memos of several Justices who clerked on the Court before 2005: Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Kagan, Justice Gorsuch, Justice Kavanaugh, Justice Barrett, and Justice Jackson. [read post]
1 May 2023, 1:04 pm by Ilya Somin
I see little reason to think Chief Justice John Roberts leans towards reversal. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:51 am by Jacob Glick
Jackson Distinguished University Professor, University of Rochester), Brendan Nyhan (James O. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:19 am by Christine Corcos
Jackson Women’s Health Organization intensify the gender biases of a constitutional order that for the majority of its existence denied women a voice in lawmaking and restricted women’s roles. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 2:25 pm by Ronald Mann
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson went even further, asking Gregory Rapawy, representing Coughlin, “why shouldn’t we require a clear indication that Congress actually considered the tribes? [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Civic Education, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 5:31 am by Emma Svoboda
The Supreme Court Decision In the Court’s opinion, published on April 19, Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the majority, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 3:32 am by jonathanturley
Jackson) in a dissent objecting that the order was “emblematic of too much of this Court’s shadow-docket decisionmaking— which every day becomes more unreasoned. [read post]