Search for: "Ramirez v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 712
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2022, 9:27 am
The proof burden for establishing that employee should be classified as exempt is on the employer, as established in the 1999 ruling of Ramirez v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 10:02 am
Ramirez, 141 S. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
E.g., Ramirez v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 5:11 am
Ramirez, supra. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 10:44 am
Ramirez,141 S. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:49 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 11:07 am
And in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:21 pm
* 5 seconds of contact time is sufficient, says Arnold JDavid reports on Compactgtl Ltd v Velocys Plc & Others [2014] EWHC 2951 (Pat), an Arnoldian decision of the Patents Court, England and Wales. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 5:30 am
Geren/Geren v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 9:11 am
See Mercer v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
Ramirez (2004) -- Fourth Amendment sufficiency of non-particularized search warrantGrutter v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:54 pm
State, 492 So. 2d 1322 (Fla. 1986); Walker v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
State, 432 S.W.3d 563 (Ark. 2014). [read post]
9 May 2025, 5:00 am
Judges have also gone on to make their thoughts on the matter public – for example, a judge in a case named Central Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:25 pm
Quoting a Second Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 11:49 am
Ramirez v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 11:49 am
Ramirez v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 3:08 am
Ramirez This is a bit of a technical decision and the implications to employment law are not direct. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 7:02 pm
Ramirez in ADA litigation. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 1:16 pm
—People v. [read post]
