Search for: "Response Brief for the United States Regarding Jurisdiction"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
” Since the CCR filed its motion, the government has submitted a collective response, the petitioners have submitted their reply brief, and three separate groups of amici have filed briefs supporting the petitioners. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
Unifund,[5] and the same is true of other states. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 3:30 am
They are therefore subject to the territorial jurisdiction of that sovereign, not of the United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 8:58 pm
The United States today is in unchartered terrain as a nation. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
Here’s a brief rundown:By far the most prominent aspect of the criminal justice reform movement has been a shift in the response to at least some illegal drug use, particularly marijuana and opioids. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
JurisdictionThe Court has jurisdiction over this matter under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 9:30 am
The defendants reply that the plaintiffs’ response focuses on opinions that are not challenged by the defendants and do not address the two issues mentioned in their initial brief. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 3:52 am
See, United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 5:13 am
It states that: “No citizen shall be imprisoned or otherwise detained by the United States except pursuant to an Act of Congress. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 12:35 pm
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:15 am
” The balance of the decision comes from neither of those groups, but rather from the idea that this particular case falls outside the normal rules for jurisdiction-stripping because it involves litigation against the United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
In its current form it states: “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:35 pm
The act must have occurred outside the United States, but must be an act that would have violated federal or state law if it were committed in the United St [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
It is, therefore, of great consequence and concern that the California court summarily decided that the order made against Google could not be enforced in the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to readers of this site. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 10:56 am
Martinez and United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:44 am
BACKGROUND The OHCHR study underscored that prevention of human rights violations is primarily the responsibility of the State.[5] Prevention requires a proactive, continuing and systemic process of addressing risk factors and causes of human rights violations through a range of measures, including law, policy and practice, to ensure respect for and protection of all human rights for all those within the State’s territory or jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
In America, for example, several claims have been brought under the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA), which gives federal courts power to hear civil cases brought by foreign citizens for injuries caused by actions “in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 1:30 am
United States, 510 U.S. 540, 550–51 (1994) (internal quotations omitted). [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
These documents, eventually known as the Pentagon Papers, chronicled the United States’ involvement with Vietnam for decades. [read post]
