Search for: "Richard Hasen"
Results 501 - 520
of 679
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2009, 8:13 am
In Forbes, University of Chicago law professor Richard Epstein discusses two cases – Alvarez v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:06 am
In the Los Angeles Times, Rick Hasen urges us to “forget the debate about whether the Supreme Court has taken a liberal run,” arguing that the views of Justice Anthony Kennedy “matter more than anything else. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 11:45 am
Richard L. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:11 am
Other coverage of Stevens and his book come from Adam Teicholz of ABC News, who reports on George Stephanopoulos’s interview with Stevens for This Week, and Richard Hasen, who at his Election Law Blog criticizes comments by Stevens on partisan gerrymandering as “wholly unconvincing. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:56 am
Commentary comes from Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:04 am
Commentary and analysis of Friday’s order come from Richard Socarides of The New Yorker, Ilya Shapiro at Forbes, Garrett Epps of The Atlantic, Kenneth Jost of Jost on Justice, Steve Sanders at ACSblog, Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Brianne Gorod and Judith Schaeffer at The New Republic, Chris Geidner at BuzzFeed, Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog, and Arthur Leonard at his eponymous blog. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:55 pm
” And also online at Slate, law professor Richard L Hasen — author of the “Election Law Blog” — has a jurisprudence essay titled “Donald Trump Is Promising to Fight the Census Case. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am
In an op-ed at The Washington Post, Richard Hasen describes “the fight to replace Justice Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court” as “the first major battle in a larger war over the future of the Court and our nation. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:46 pm
We have a Board of Directors who help oversee our process, which Professor Hasen correctly points out is self-appointed. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:11 am
” At Slate, Richard Hasen suggests that “[i]t’s a great time for liberals to brush up on their knowledge of originalism and textualism” if they want to succeed before the newly constituted Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:11 am
” (Thanks to Rick Hasen of Election Law Blog for the link.) [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:20 am
” In the Georgetown Law Journal, Richard Hasen argues that the “conservative majority has taken the Court’s election jurisprudence on a pro-partisanship turn, which gives political actors freer range to pass laws and enact policies that can help entrench politicians (particularly Republicans) in power and insulate them from political competition. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:57 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re discusses last week’s decision in Wellness International Network v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:43 pm
Richard Hasen further explains that "any effort to use the list to purge the rolls at this point could vioate the federal provision that prohibits systematic voter removal purges within 90 days of a federal election. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:20 am
” At USA Today, Richard Wolf discusses some of the hypotheticals raised by challengers to the Affordable Care Act and concludes that if the Act “is to withstand legal challenge, government lawyers must convince a majority of justices that the health care marketplace is unique. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:45 am
In Slate, Richard Hasen ponders whether Citizens United allows for foreign spending on American elections. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 6:44 pm
” Online at Slate, law professor Richard L. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:06 am
At Election Law Blog, Richard Hasen has a post on new insider information about the drafting of Austin v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
” Rick Hasen of the Election Law Blog has coverage of that case. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 4:44 am
The case is also the focus of the Room for Debate page of The New York Times, where debaters include Richard Hasen (who also has extensive links to coverage of the case at his Election Law Blog), Ilya Shapiro, Bradley Smith, Ciara Torres-Spellicsy, and Elizabeth Wydra; other coverage comes from Kenneth Jost at Jost on Justice, who observes that the Court in Citizens United “made clear it has no qualms about setting corporations free to spend freely on political… [read post]
