Search for: "Rider v State" Results 501 - 520 of 784
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2012, 11:40 pm by Leland E. Beck
Swift completion, release, and publication of the final rule were likely prompted by the scheduled argument this morning before the United States Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 12:55 pm by Jeffrey Neuburger
In a ruling that is being hailed as a victory for web scrapers and the open nature of publicly available website data, the Ninth Circuit today issued its long-awaited opinion in hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 12:48 pm
And there are some special regulations for riders of personal watercraft. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 11:24 am by Tian Lu
It was the first fan fiction case in China, in which the legal status of unlicensed fan work was tested in court.Here’s what Xi writes: Unconstraint state of mind (?) [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:31 am by Cody M. Poplin
   Back in the United States, the Hill reports that the Department of State has announced plans to bring an average of 1,500 Syrian refugees per month to the United States in order to fulfill President Barack Obama’s goal of settling 10,000 in the country by September. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 12:30 am by Norman Gregory Fernandez
Often times, in car v. motorcycle accidents, potential jurors are prejudiced against motorcycle riders because they feel that we are engaged in a dangerous activity, or potential jury members may not like the way we dress. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 5:59 pm
Recognizing that "the magnetic strip incorporating the computer data on certain MetroCards, which contained no valid fare, were altered so that the cards would appear, and be read, as authentic for the admission of a rider by the turnstile computers," the First Department in People v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by Justin Chan
” — Parker Rider-Longmaid, one of Rodney Reed’s attorneys — April 19, 2023 The Court’s opinion in Reed v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 6:38 pm by Rick Hills
" Imagine that Congress enacted a rider stating that "the Secretary of Health & Human Services shall expend no monies responding to any Presidential request for his or her opinion, in writing, upon the subject of health reform": Would not such a rider obviously violate Article II? [read post]