Search for: "Rock v. State Bar"
Results 501 - 520
of 629
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2013, 11:55 pm
Lee v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Lee v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:29 pm
That's Neal Katyal, Acting Solicitor General of the United States, during oral argument in the US Supreme Court today.The case is Ashcroft v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL’s efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal’s ‘one-size-fits-all’ fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims – ActionAid’s unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am
Here is a summary of important cases that have been granted a hearing by the Supreme Court: An abandoned FBI vehicle-tracking device/Wired.com United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:03 pm
And his wife, probably not all Cherokee either, died in Little Rock along the way. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 10:46 am
Wallace (1939), and United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 9:30 am
The Supreme Court’s July 4 decision in Abu-Khdeir v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am
Under 42 CFR Sec. 424.535(a) (12), CMS can revoke Medicare billing privileges if a provider or supplier is terminated, revoked or otherwise barred from participation in a State Medicaid program or any other Federal health care program. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:26 am
CMS can revoke Medicare billing privileges if a provider or supplier is terminated, revoked or otherwise barred from participation in a State Medicaid program or any other Federal health care program. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 2:07 pm
” Knight v. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 5:26 am
" Cesard v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:26 pm
See Opinion and Order, Binno v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:53 am
Not long after that, she emailed the director stating she was making a formal accommodation request to attend medical appointments. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:26 pm
See Opinion and Order, Binno v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
The plaintiffs are the now common-place third party payers (mostly union pension funds) ("TPPs") who claim they paid too much for the drug in reimbursing prescriptions that doctors made for members of TPP plans.In addition to the consumer fraud claims we’ve mentioned, there are state antitrust claims (the issue mostly being whether indirect purchasers barred from recovering under federal antitrust law by Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
