Search for: "Rome v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 710
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2011, 7:27 am
Cornelis A. de Visser, The law governing the voluntary assignment of claims under the Rome I Regulation, p. 461-467. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
’[3] On the question of domestic law the Court finds that ‘the law of the United States has been uniform since its founding that corporations can be held liable for the torts committed by their agents. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
All roads lead to Rome China. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:39 am
Rio Tinto and the debate on this blog about Doe v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 4:24 pm
X, C-509/09 and Martinez v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:01 pm
By Dennis Crouch Typhoon Touch Tech. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:36 pm
Smith, for the election and consecration of V. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:24 am
Silberman, Morrison v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Justice Eakin’s most memorable dissent I’m aware of was in Porreco v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:50 pm
In its recent judgment in Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10 eDate Advertising GmbH v X and Olivier Martinez v MGN Ltd (25 October 2011), the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union has laid down a radical new rule of jurisdiction over torts committed online, giving claimants the choice of suing in their home courts. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 4:48 am
Even among the 119 states parties to the Rome Statute of the ICC, some states impose criminal liability on legal entities for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide – including France, which recently adopted such a provision. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:31 am
Carr and Reynolds v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:02 am
He arrived wearing a black hooded cape and mask of a type featured in a British film about a pro-democracy activist of the near-future, V For Vendetta. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:12 am
Supreme Court in Sosa v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
First, in Marley v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 3:57 am
Like the Second and Fourth Circuits, the brief simply ignores Article 10 of the Rome Statute’s insistence that “[n]othing in this Part shall be interpreted as limiting or prejudicing in any way existing or developing rules of international law for purposes other than this Statute.“ Indeed, it claims (p. 16) that there is “no reason to discount the Rome Statute as evidence of state practice in favor of inconsistent and ambiguous opinions from… [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 2:52 am
First, Sosa v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 5:49 pm
City of Rome, 53 Ga. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 7:23 am
Patrick Dunn won in State v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 9:12 pm
Article 75 of the Rome Statute gave victims a right to seek reparations: Article 75 Reparations to victims 1. [read post]
