Search for: "Rose v. Rose" Results 501 - 520 of 3,887
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2021, 3:57 pm by Aaron Moss
The Supreme Court’s seminal fair use decision, Campbell v. [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:43 am by Giles Peaker
  Chuan-Hui & Ors v K Group Holdings Inc & Ors (2021) EWCA Civ 403 The Court of Appeal determined that sums demanded from leaseholders by a Tribunal appointed manager for maintenance during their period of appointment were service charges under the lease for the purposes of Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, even if the obligation to pay them rose from the Tribunal’s management order. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hence, the plaintiff must “reasonably allege that the fee bore no rational relationship to the product delivered” (Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d 59, 70 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]
4 May 2021, 3:21 am by CMS
The High Court judge, Rose J, also dismissed all the claims related to the December dividend and there was no appeal of this part of the decision. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 9:07 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Trade marksGuestKat Riana Harvey analysed a recent decision from the England and Wales High Court (EWHC) in Swatch AG v Apple Inc. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 5:27 am
The Internet MessengerAuthor Buky Schwartz Licence CC BY-2,5 Source  Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Sir Geoffrey Vos MR, Lady Justice Rose and Lord Justice Arnold) Warner Music UK Ltd and others v TuneIn Inc,  [2021] EWCA Civ 441 (26 March 2021)This was an appeal by Tunein Inc. against Mr Justice Birss judgment in Warner Music UK Ltd and others v TuneIn Inc [2019] EWHC 2923 (Ch) ( [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 3:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Nor does the complaint contain allegations that there was continuous representation from 2002 forward regarding the structuring of the tax shelters (Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d 59, 67-68 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 9:41 am by Melody McDonald Lanier
The Supreme Court has agreed with this numerous times, such as in Brandenburg v. [read post]