Search for: "Royal v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 2,233
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2020, 4:48 pm
” Google LLC v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 6:04 am
R. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:13 am
Snapp & Son, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 10:17 am
The decision is likely to have consequences not only for the appeal against the Court of Appeal’s denial of access to the English courts in Okpabi v Royal Dutch Shell, but also for the development of a more general duty of care of parent companies towards employees and people living in the vicinity of mines or industrial plants run by subsidiaries. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 11:13 am
See Royal Dev. and Mgmt. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 11:13 am
See Royal Dev. and Mgmt. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 3:06 pm
(Tag: International Whistleblowers) Additionally, UK whistleblower protections received a boost in a November 27, 2019, Supreme Court decision (Royal Mail Group Ltd v Jhuti). [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:29 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum (United States), Lafarge (France), Lundi Petroleum (Sweden), and Guus Kouwenhoven (Netherlands). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:26 am
The Supreme Court in the UK has held in the case of Royal Mail Group Ltd v Jhuti that, where the real reason for dismissal is a protected disclosure which has been hidden from the person determining the dismissal, by a person in a position of responsibility, the dismissal is automatically unfair, even where the decision maker relied upon the reason for the dismissal in good faith. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:39 am
First up is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm
Royal Borough of Kingston-Upon-Thames v Moss (2019) EWHC 3261 (Ch) Ever since Jones v London Borough of Southwark (2016) EWHC 457 (Ch) (our report), the position on water rates taken as rent by a number of London Councils and Housing Associations under agreements with Thames Water has been conflicted. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:00 am
All of the opinions in NFIB v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:04 am
Royal Mail Group Ltd v Jhuti, heard 12-13 Jun 2019. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 2:41 am
Royal Mail Group Ltd v Jhuti, heard 12-13 Jun 2019. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 9:43 am
Royal Mail Group Ltd v Jhuti, heard 12-13 Jun 2019. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:24 pm
Thus far, the press has successfully argued that anything more than self-regulation would reduce them to Pravda-esque publications, doing the bidding of the Nanny state Government that would otherwise regulate them. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Royal College of Dental Surgeons of Ontario[v], professional regulators have been required to take into account and balance competing principles. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:05 am
We’re talking about royal commission transcripts. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:40 am
Royal Mail Group Ltd v Jhuti, heard 12-13 Jun 2019. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 1:17 am
', Lars Brahms looks at the recent England and Wales High Court decision of Vestel Elektronik Sanayi v HEVC Advance LLC, which raised this question as well as the questions of what the proper basis would be for such a claim, and where this claim might be brought.Trade MarksGuestKat Nedim Malovic examines an intriguing decision from the General Court, which stated that the relevant public's attention is 'average at best' when assessing likelihood of… [read post]
