Search for: "SEALED APPELLANT 1"
Results 501 - 520
of 680
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2011, 9:34 pm
Dever (of the EDNC, sitting by designation) described the three harms caused by the seal provision, according to the plaintiffs: Appellants contend the seal provisions of 31 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:51 am
The court, p. 16, also noticed that even the appellants agreed that some FCA cases deserve to be sealed. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:12 am
Nebraska, 511 U.S. 1, (1994). [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
Harris, 2011 NY Slip Op 30165(U) (Sup Ct Nassau County Mar. 1, 2011). [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
On the bottom left there was the official seal of the EPO. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:43 pm
The court cites to a slew of federal appellate cases (including US v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 10:30 am
The warrant affidavit is sealed, but the government has indicated that the appellant is being investigated for federal-program theft, extortion, fraud, and money laundering. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
Stockwell’s arguments that (1) his prior 1986 conviction for first degree statutory rape is not comparable to the current crime of first degree child rape; (2) the trial court erred by sealing jury questionnaires without weighing the five Bone-Club factors; (3) the trial court erred when ruling on challenges to certain jurors for cause; (4) the trial court erred by sending certain exhibits to the jury room; and (5) his appellate counsel on direct appeal… [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:54 am
UCC 1-201(b)(20). [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1966)). [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:16 pm
Debt Recovery Tribunal 2009 (1) LW 954, 2009 (2) CTC 302, 2009 (3) MLJ 1271:“38. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 12:42 pm
No. 10/317,192; Technology Center 2100 Decided November 19, 2009 Method claim 1 recited: 1. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 4:00 am
The Report was provided to the Tribunal by the Municipality as part of the evidence its representatives and the appellants would be relying on at the Hearing. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:30 pm
If you’ve ever visited the main page of my original website, you know that I start right off the bat by explaining that you have the right to remain silent, and advising that you use it. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 10:57 pm
Before the Supreme Court, it was urged by the Appellants that the first Proviso to Section 394(1) applied only to the amalgamation of a company which was being wound up, and not to cases where the prayer in the amalgamation petition was for “dissolution without winding up”. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 10:20 am
So step 1 is to get a big bag of seals. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Justice BhandariThe Supreme Court in State of Uttranchal v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 3:21 am
See Defendants’ Reply Memorandum, at 9- 1 1. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:03 am
Thus, the right of access may be denied only where the government shows (1) that a compelling governmental interest requires the materials be kept under seal and (2) there is no less restrictive means, such as redaction, available. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm
What I found was that (1) the seals aren't always there; (2) even if they were, you can remove the cartridge without visible evidence of tampering with the seal and (3) you can remove the circuit-board cover without even disturbing the plastic-strap seal; (4) even if that hadn't been true, the seal-inspection records are quite lackadaisical and incomplete; and (5) even if that weren't true, since the counties tend to re-use the same serial… [read post]
