Search for: "SOUTH V. STATE"
Results 501 - 520
of 12,184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2023, 10:34 am
Counsel, 471 U.S. 626, 628 (1985) [4] Central Hudson v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Teaching an old dog new tricks Can you teach an old dog (in this instance, States and state public health apparatus) new tricks? [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
The Supreme Court of South Carolina discussed this fact pattern in State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 11:58 am
Counsel, 471 U.S. 626, 628 (1985) [4] Central Hudson v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 10:00 am
"Short pieces:Border Dialectics: Progress, Regress, and Resistance (Völkerrechtsblog, Sept. 2023) [text]Secretary-General Appoints Ruvendrini Menikdiwela of Sri Lanka Assistant High Commissioner, Office of United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UN, Nov. 2023) [text]Reports:Asylum Governance Instruments in Canada, Brazil, South Africa and Turkey: Status Determination, Structural Vulnerability and the Right to Work (CEPS, Oct. 2023) [text]IML Information Note… [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
This practice did not end until well after the Supreme Court struck down race-based school segregation in Brown v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 11:04 am
Shands v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
” The complaint alleges Sun made threats against officials with the city, interfered with a lawful court order, violated state custodial interference laws, and engaged in disorderly conduct. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 10:27 pm
If you have any questions regarding the matters raised in this article, please contact the authors. [1] CCIG Investments Pty Ltd v Schokman [2023] HCA 21 at [4]-[6]. [2] Ibid at [12], citing Bugge v Brown (1919) 26 CLR 110 at 118; New South Wales v Lepore (2003) 212 CLR 511 at 589 [223]; Sweeney v Boylan Nominees Pty Ltd (2006) 226 CLR 161 at 173 [33]; Prince Alfred College Inc v ADC (2016) 258 CLR 134 at 148 [40]. [3] Ibid at [14]. [4] Schokman… [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:02 pm
” Cohen v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am
But the court declined without comment to take up the state of South Carolina’s twice-relisted petition in Stirling v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:38 am
In the case of Stiwich v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
Freedom of Religious Associations and Gaum v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 2 November 2023, the District Court of New South Wales struck out and dismissed proceedings in the case of Woolf v Brandt [2023] NSWDC 460 on the basis that they were brought outside the limitation period. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm
As of July 18, 2023, a total of 10 outbreak-associated cases of hepatitis A have been reported from four states (CA (2), HI (1), OR (1), WA (6)). [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 5:25 pm
Harrell v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
States also have a corresponding obligation to regulate the protection of human rights in sport, and to provide access to efficient and effective legal remedies for cases of discrimination or other human rights abuses by sporting bodies or private actors.4. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 1:01 am
District Court, District of Columbia, stated in the 1974 ruling in Relf v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:00 pm
It's a prosecutor-v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:39 am
The case of BP Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd v Trade Rose Investments (Pvt) Ltd revolves around an application for security for costs, a procedural safeguard embedded within South African litigation framework. [read post]