Search for: "STARKS v. THE STATE"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,625
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2012, 1:30 am
Jarrell v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 6:28 am
On September 2, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in John Haight et al. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:30 am
Morley & Ors v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm
Plenty of trial and appellate judges likely do not take kindly to the United States Supreme Court decisions in Missouri v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
In Gruzlovic v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:09 am
” Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP (US), 134 AD3d 610, 615 (1st Dept. 2015) (internal citation omitted). [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:42 am
Shuler v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:57 pm
Based in part on this assurance, the Supreme Court in February of this year dismissed the case, Clapper v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 2:16 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 1:54 pm
Marci Hill Jordan is a Shareholder in Stark & Stark’s Marlton, New Jersey office, specializing in Workers’ Compensation Law. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:31 pm
In Slominsk v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
The answer is complex, simply because it depends on: the actual compensation arrangement being proposed the application of federal law (including Stark and anti kickback rules) to the extent it applies and state law governing self-referral, fee-splitting, kickbacks, and patient brokering Federal law contains numerous exceptions to Stark and "safe harbors" under anti-kickback law. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
’[10] This approach stands in stark contrast to the majority in Kiobel, who primarily rely on a misreading of footnote 20 to justify their misguided recourse to customary international law on the question of corporate liability. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:22 pm
" United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
However, caselaw confirms that welfare is still ‘a primary consideration’ (ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 2 AC 166, [2011] UKSC 4), so it’s going to be a pretty important factor in any consideration of publication, and in many cases it will be determinative. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:37 am
Case Information Canada v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:37 am
Case Information Canada v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:37 am
Case Information Canada v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:37 am
Case Information Canada v. [read post]
