Search for: "STARKS v. THE STATE" Results 501 - 520 of 1,590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2017, 6:13 am by Andres
This follows two controversial previous decisions in Delfi v Estonia and MTE v Hungary. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP (US), 134 AD3d 610, 615 (1st Dept. 2015) (internal citation omitted). [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 1:54 pm by Marci Hill Jordan
Marci Hill Jordan is a Shareholder in Stark & Stark’s Marlton, New Jersey office, specializing in Workers’ Compensation Law. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:57 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Based in part on this assurance, the Supreme Court in February of this year dismissed the case, Clapper v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
The answer is complex, simply because it depends on: the actual compensation arrangement being proposed the application of federal law (including Stark and anti kickback rules) to the extent it applies and state law governing self-referral, fee-splitting, kickbacks, and patient brokering Federal law contains numerous exceptions to Stark and "safe harbors" under anti-kickback law. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
However, caselaw confirms that welfare is still ‘a primary consideration’ (ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 2 AC 166, [2011] UKSC 4), so it’s going to be a pretty important factor in any consideration of publication, and in many cases it will be determinative. [read post]