Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF M. C., ET AL."
Results 501 - 520
of 527
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
I'm back from the two-day "Future of the Global Law Firm" symposium at Georgetown Law School, which was organized by Prof. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Ranbaxy and AstraZeneca reach agreement in Esomeprazole patent litigation: (SmartBrief), (IPBiz), (Spicy IP), (Profitability through Simplicity), (IP Law360), (Philip Brooks), (GenericsWeb), Cadbury loses Australian battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law… [read post]
CANADA - Results by design: the artefactual construction of high recidivism rates for sex offenders.
17 Apr 2008, 2:21 am
Clearly, the extent to which this prerequisite is met is problematic in the Langevin et al. study. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
And so… for a short time… we move away from the blawgs of the United States of America…. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:22 pm
We hold that plaintiffs have not shown the requisite culpability, and AFFIRM the district court's ruling. 07a0473p.06 Richardson, et al v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 9:03 am
And that's exactly what happened with Ashcroft, Comey, Goldsmith, et al., when the President was prepared to adopt Addington's views rather than theirs, and to break the law contrary to their judgment. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 10:38 am
Howell, et al. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
REES, et al. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:02 am
Sources [1] Ethan Katsh, et al., E-Commerce, E-Disputes, and E-Dispute Resolution: Is the Shadow of "eBay Law",15 OHIO ST. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 1:53 am
Hardison et al. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 5:30 pm
The state court judges have an interest in the impact of the "mis-named Class Action Fairness Act of 2005" particularly the question of its impact on the caseload in complex litigation departments in California state courts. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:29 am
Safetech, et al Eastern Distric [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
NLRB, 39 F.3d 106 (6th Cir. 1994), in which the court reversed the Board's finding of violation and found that arguably similar remarks were protected by Section 8(c) of the Act. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
Gallagher et al. focused on the best available studies, but some of these studies had significant threats to validity. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 1:14 am
Neil Kramer et al. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 5:53 am
Radley, et al., Off-Label Prescribing Among Office-Based Physicians, 166 Arch. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 11:03 am
Chandler, et al. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 10:22 am
., et al. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 8:23 am
Elizabeth Chira, et al. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
Here is the 12/17/03 opinion in D & M Healthcare, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
