Search for: "STATE v BUSH"
Results 501 - 520
of 4,520
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2017, 2:04 pm
Additionally, Pryor has called Roe v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:51 am
Environmental Protection Agency is a murky mess of a case.United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:40 pm
President Bush then pocket vetoed the NDAA, a remarkable action given the importance of the NDAA. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
Bush, allowing Guantánamo detainees to challenge the legality of their detention. [read post]
27 May 2022, 4:00 am
In Resurrection School v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 8:38 am
Padilla One More Time: Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Atkinson v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:11 pm
(citing State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 11:18 pm
Nikki Haley should stay in this race until every state in the nation has voted just as George Herbert Walker Bush did in 1980 when he ran against Ronald Reagan. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 7:20 am
But the theory made an appearance in a concurring opinion by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist in Bush v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 3:20 pm
" Lincoln v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:49 pm
They did it in Riegel v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 1:15 am
Pete V. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 2:15 pm
Just in time for the start of the semester, Lakhdar Boumediene, the lead plaintiff in Boumediene v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 2:01 pm
” Only a handful were transferred out of Guantanamo in December 2008 and January 2009 because of court orders after the Supreme Court decided in Boumediene v Bush that detainees should have the habeas court right to challenge their detention. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:36 am
[Post by Venkat] State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 8:42 am
But one reason is that, for all of the justified outrage over Bush v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:04 pm
That would set the stage for targeted post-election litigation over ballot-counting procedures – essentially a reprise of Bush v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 10:08 pm
DL v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 6:48 am
EPA is State Farm for a new generation. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 4:51 am
As is often the case with 3-judge panels, one jurist stays poker-faced; this time, it was Bush appointee, Judge Jeffery Sutton.Since the SCOTUS decision in United States v Windsor, nearly every state's federal court system has cultivated a same-sex marriage case, usually challenging the constitutionality of a state law that bans or limits the rights of same-sex couples. [read post]
