Search for: "STATE v LATER" Results 501 - 520 of 41,845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
New York State Thruway Authority, 62 N.Y.2d 855 [refusal to obey an order claimed justified as consistent with the advice of union officials], Scazafavo v Erie County Water Authority, 30 AD3d 1034, [refusal to comply with an order to submit to drug testing because the employee did not believe that he was subject to random drug testing] and Tanvikr v NYC Health and Hospital Corporation, 112 AD 3d 436, [employee refused to obey orders to undertake training for a new position… [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 8:27 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The worker presented documentation from a hospital emergency room showing that he had fainted on a subway platform on his way to the clinic and was told by a doctor not to travel for several days.Judge Garcia recommended that the charges against the employee be dismissed.Other decisions in which ignoring the principle "work now, grieve later" was a consideration include  Ferreri v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
New York State Thruway Authority, 62 N.Y.2d 855 [refusal to obey an order claimed justified as consistent with the advice of union officials], Scazafavo v Erie County Water Authority, 30 AD3d 1034, [refusal to comply with an order to submit to drug testing because the employee did not believe that he was subject to random drug testing] and Tanvikr v NYC Health and Hospital Corporation, 112 AD 3d 436, [employee refused to obey orders to undertake training for a new position… [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:06 am by Ahilan Arulanantham
But the harm arising from such individuals entering other states occurs only if they later move to Texas or Missouri and then obtain public services there. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 4:20 am by Steven Moore & Elizabeth Swedock
Although such Final Rules were widely criticized by most companies in the United States, a sole individual, Dr. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:01 pm by brian
Evans, nor did the panel hold, as Jason would have it, that "if the state gives you something it can't later take it away. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:09 am by Corey Rayburn Yung
For essentially the reasons explained by the Court of Appeals, see United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 4:33 pm by Jeff Gittins
In the 1990s, the State sold its property to a third party, who later sold the land to Millennia Partners North LLC ("MPN) in 2008. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:14 am by vforberger
Pennsylvania State Police, 603 Pa. 156, 983 A.2d 627, 637 (2009) (quoting Shambach v. [read post]