Search for: "STATE v SHARP" Results 501 - 520 of 2,859
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
 IntroductionOn 9 May 2019, the South African Constitutional Court, the highest appellate court in South Africa, heard its first ever patent litigation case in Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited v Merck Sharpe Dohme Corporation. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
 IntroductionOn 9 May 2019, the South African Constitutional Court, the highest appellate court in South Africa, heard its first ever patent litigation case in Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited v Merck Sharpe Dohme Corporation. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am by Jani Ihalainen
 IntroductionOn 9 May 2019, the South African Constitutional Court, the highest appellate court in South Africa, heard its first ever patent litigation case in Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited v Merck Sharpe Dohme Corporation. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 28800-20 de Waal, Tabor and Runcie v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 02356-19, 00230-20 Sharp v dailyrecord.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 3 Harassment (2018), 12 Discrimination (2018), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 00231-20 Sharp v mirror.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), 3… [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
United States Bloomberg had a piece “Fox News Faces $2.7 Billion Lawsuit Over Voting Machine Fraud Claims”. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
ABA Model Rule 8.4(g) in the States, 68 Catholic University Law Review 629 (2020). [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Tia Sewell
Pack then appointed new conservative leaders of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, the Office of Cuba Broadcasting, Radio Free Asia and the Middle East Broadcasting Network—decisions that drew sharp criticism from senior staffers at the organizations affected. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am by David Super
  As early as 1928, the Court had indicated that it did not regard this sharp line as sustainable. [read post]