Search for: "STATE v WATERS" Results 501 - 520 of 10,822
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm by Giles Peaker
The tenant’s tenancy agreement (as revised) stated he had to pay the ‘exact amount’ due for water for the property. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:11 pm by Dennis Crouch
The result is that the scope of patentable subject matter is certainly narrowed from its 1998 high-water-mark. * * * * * In Bilski v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:13 pm by Patricia Salkin
The court found that contrary to petitioners’ contention, the Water Resources Law (ECL art 15) did not preempt local zoning laws concerning land use, but only preempted those local laws that attempt “to regulate withdrawals of groundwater,” which “includes all surface and underground water within the state’s territorial limits”. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 10:35 am by Richard M. Re
Earlier this month, the Court granted review of Hughes v.... [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:15 am by Sean Minahan
  The court’s entire decision can be found at Edwards Aquifer Authority v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:49 am
In short, Coty was the exclusive licensee for the Community trade mark DAVIDOFF HOT WATER for perfumery. [read post]