Search for: "STATE v WATERS"
Results 501 - 520
of 10,827
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
In Must v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 12:15 pm
Save Our Access v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:52 am
Wenona Singel will offer commentary on Haaland v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:25 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm
Ehrman, Southern Methodist University School of Law, and Robin Kundis Craig, USC Gould School of Law EPA’s regulatory authority is limited by the Supreme Court’s interpretation of “waters of the United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 5:21 am
Significantly Narrows Scope of Federal Wetlands Permitting The Supreme Court’s most recent opinion on the Clean Water Act, Sackett v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Supreme Court’s decision in Sackett v EPA, announced on May 25, 2023, was unanimous in that the EPA’s wetlands regulatory jurisdiction is limited to wetlands with a continuous surface connection to the waters of the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Kiger v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
In Chewy v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
”Looks like there's more water boarding ahead for A.D.M.# # #DECISIONMatter of A.D.M v City of Mount Vernon [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:39 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 2:31 pm
EPA on the scope of federal regulation under the Clean Water Act), while others did not produce the conservative result we were told to expect (Allen v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
Yesterday's closing argument in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm
The legislation restricts wetlands that the state can regulate to those considered “waters of the United States,” and it specifies that wetlands do not include prior converted cropland. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
Is a product put on the market before the date of filing of a European patent application to be excluded from the state of the art within the meaning of Article 54(2) EPC for the sole reason that its composition or internal structure could not be analysed and reproduced without undue burden by the skilled person before that date? [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:18 pm
The post State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:25 pm
Baker and Mathew (Tribal Jurisdiction; Younger Abstention Doctrine) United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 8:36 am
United States (D. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 5:56 pm
The Hardwick class consists of every individual in the state of Ohio with measurable concentrations of certain PFAS chemicals. [read post]
