Search for: "STATE v. ABAT"
Results 501 - 520
of 965
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2014, 10:51 am
An example of a general legacy is “I give [pounds] 100 to X”: Wood Estate v. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 1:43 pm
Specifically, you head over to United States Tax Court. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 9:00 am
Kleinberg, in People of the State of California v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:21 pm
People v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:29 am
Last month the Supreme Court of Mississippi handed down its 6-3 split opinion in the matter of Harrington v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 8:35 am
In Mounted Police Association of Ontario v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 8:24 am
This requirement to obtain written permission was upheld in the 1993, Houston Court of Appeals [1 Dist.] case, United States Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:44 am
It is here that we take in the sorta-live broadcast of pretrial proceedings in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 8:23 am
In The City of San Antonio v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:15 pm
Kleinberg made his remarks after closing arguments in The People of California v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 8:44 am
CATHERINE MITCHELL, ET AL., No. 11-0366 , a case that was argued last December and has been abated since May 2013. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 6:08 am
There is a 1992, Texas Supreme Court decision styled, Hines v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 3:31 am
State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 2:47 pm
In the recent case of AC v DR decided by New York Justice Stacy D. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:54 am
A new provision was added stating that the Act “does not prohibit a governmental unit from awarding a contract, grant, tax abatement, or tax credit to a private owner, bidder, contractor, or subcontractor who enters into or who is party” to a PLA so long as entering into that PLA “is not a condition for award of the contract, grant, tax abatement, or tax credit. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
With today’s orders, the Court also lifted the abatement in LARRY T. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:12 pm
RemandedRead More: State high court: Music festivals on farms not shielded from nuisance complaintsBalintulo v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
*** * In its Stewart decision, the Appellate Division states "Consistent with its statutory purpose, the Sheriff's resort to Civil Service Law §71 was presumably “to secure a steady, reliable, and adequate work force,” (Matter of Duncan v New York State Dev. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:58 am
Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit held in California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 9:21 am
Co. v. [read post]
