Search for: "STATE v. FLOYD"
Results 501 - 520
of 843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2014, 2:08 pm
Writing for the majority in Bostic v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:21 am
In 2010, it sued in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas alleging unauthorized interception and broadcast of the December 2007 "Undefeated" match between Floyd Mayweather and Ricky Hatton. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 8:27 am
State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 1:08 pm
This is especially important here in Florida because this is the fifth-highest state for uninsured motorists, with one out of ever four drivers lacking coverage, according to the Insurance Research Council. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:42 pm
In McDonald v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 12:03 pm
Circuit Judge Paul V. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:57 am
In a 2-1 decision in Bostic v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:22 am
” In fact it was the 1976 case, Buckley v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:58 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 4:52 am
So people like Bobbi Jo Floyd are forced to forfeit a fundamental constitutional right in order to avail themselves of a right permitted under state law? [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:52 am
At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, Emily Phelps recounts the testimony of North Carolina state senator Floyd McKissick at last week’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on a proposed constitutional amendment on campaign finance reform in light of the Chief Justice’s comments on donor influence in McCutcheon v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Harris and KBR v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:42 am
The second group of witnesses were law professor Jamin Raskin, legendary First Amendment lawyer Floyd Abrams, and North Carolina state senator Floyd McKissick, Jr. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
From Statement of Floyd Abrams Before the Senate Judiciary Committee at a Hearing Regarding S.J. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 5:46 am
Phelps), and false claims to possess the Medal of Honor (United States v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:15 am
In particular he stated that 'there was no suggestion from either party that the Shanks patents were crucial to Unilever’s success. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
He cited Floyd J in Qualcom v Nokia , who said that “If the apparatus has to undergo physical modification before it can be used, then prima facie it is not suitable for use and does not infringe”. [read post]
14 May 2014, 4:05 am
Floyd, might hold the deciding vote. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:35 am
Heath Abshure, president of the North American Securities Administrators Association, an organization of state securities regulators. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:38 am
The McCutcheon v. [read post]
