Search for: "STATE v. KEEN"
Results 501 - 520
of 907
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2014, 5:46 am
Banks), and public employees keen to speak about official (mis)conduct (Garcetti v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:44 pm
Rutherford & Ors v Secretary of State for Work And Pensions [2014] EWHC 1613 (Admin) This was the Judicial Review, supported by CPAG, of the failure of the bedroom tax regulations to address the position of tenants where a bedroom was needed for overnight carers for a child. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:00 am
Of course, Americans have attorney-client privilege[4] as all keen television viewers know. [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:13 pm
Notice that wasn't given here.So now the state will get notice. [read post]
16 May 2014, 4:47 am
v=KuC-oXTwZFg&feature=youtu.be andhttp://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
16 May 2014, 4:47 am
v=KuC-oXTwZFg&feature=youtu.be andhttp://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
1 May 2014, 7:35 am
The Koushal judges were very keen to ensure that the law did not disturb the social status quo. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:02 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:30 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 11:34 am
In Michael Toth v Emirates [2011] EWPCC 18, 13 June 2011.) [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 9:53 am
RETRIEVER SVERIGE In the high profile case of Case-466/12 Svensson & Others v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 3:01 am
In a March 3, 2014 order (here), the Court granted the defendant’s petition for writ of certiorari in Indiana State District Council of Laborers v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:14 pm
But in covering the case of RS v SS [2013] EWHC B33 (Fam) he’s done just that. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:54 am
For those keen to see Zhu suffer further, the Court of Appeal in The Hague then went on to consider, obiter, what the position would have been had Zhu’s use for export in fact constituted sufficient use to support a bad faith claim. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 7:58 am
Gautzsch Großhandel v Münchener Boulevard Mobel Joseph Duna,to address this question. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:51 am
The Ninth Circuit arguably erred because, while relying on the US Supreme Court’s decision in Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music (92-1292), 510 US 569 (1994), it overlooked the part of Campbellin which the majority stated that the defence of fair use may apply to a satire if “there is little or no risk of market substitution [of the original work with the later work], whether because of the large extent of transformation of the earlier work, . . . [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
This is because, like all keen IP bloggers, they are in a state of perpetual catch-up: the moment we take time off to read a piece of news, give it some thought and then write it up, something else suddenly crops up while we're not looking. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:56 am
It’s been some time since I last blogged but, in the meantime, I’ve followed with keen interest the diplomatic crisis between the United States concerning the Indian diplomat, Devyani Khobragade. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court denied cert in Cotterman v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 2:50 pm
But if the state can't prove that fact, then the statute does indeed violate the free speech rights of the LSAC. [read post]
