Search for: "STEPHEN LAW V."
Results 501 - 520
of 7,776
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
STEPHEN SKJONSBY, Defendant. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:10 pm
Pfeiffer v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 12:32 am
Copyright © Stephen M. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 1:02 pm
By: Stephen D. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 5:48 pm
Stephen I. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 3:45 pm
Perhaps not, argue Hughes Hubbard patent practitioners Etan Chatlynne, Stephen Kenny, and Lucas Watkins in Investigating Patent Law's Presumption of Validity, Part II: An Empirical Analysis of How Unconsidered Evidence and Evidentiary Standards Affect Jury Verdicts. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:26 pm
” Wait v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 3:34 am
Stephen C. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:25 pm
In our prior nonpublished opinion, Tedesco v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 1:21 pm
The best sources of business for a law firm are referrals from current and former clients. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
A Program Commemorating the 40th Anniversary of Chiarella v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 4:14 pm
The internet is global and law relating to it must derive from globally agreed principles; ii. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:17 pm
People v Murphy Court Discusses Whether the Sentence Imposed was Excessive in Driving While Intoxicated Offenses The defendant was convicted of aggravated driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2-a) (b), driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2), and driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (3). [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:24 pm
In Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 7:08 pm
Yet, in KSR v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 3:57 am
Written by Stephen G.A. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 3:26 pm
Congratulations to lawyers Alan Beck, Stephen Stamboulieh, and Frank Saccoccio on the victory. [read post]
9 May 2012, 7:20 am
The latest issue of the International Criminal Law Review (Vol. 12, no. 2, 2012) is out. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 10:44 am
As explained in Stephen, California procedural law – unlike the Federal Rules – required an immediate appeal upon denial of certification specifically because successive motions are not permitted:It is only in the absence of relevant state precedent that courts turn to federal law and rule 23 for guidance. [] State and federal courts parted company on the appealability issue 24 years ago in Daar v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 5:39 am
Stephen I. [read post]
