Search for: "STONE v. CASE" Results 501 - 520 of 2,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2023, 6:36 am by INFORRM
In a comprehensive judgment handed down today in the case of Various Claimants v Associated Newspapers Limited [2023] EWHC 2789 (KB), Mr Justice Nicklin dismissed the application by the Defendant, the publisher of the Daily Mail,  for summary judgment against the seven claimants on limitation grounds. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 12:56 pm
I received several calls from media outlets over the past couple of days, seeking comment on the case of Steven Biegel v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:48 am by Steve Kalar
 Held:  Issue One: “[W]e hold that Pimentel-Lopezdoes not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review under Teague v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Sources: Making the Case for Compliance Programs at Privately Held Companies from Corpedia The Implications of Stone v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 1:05 am
Here are some quick takes on the case: Darian Ibrahim is writing a paper about individual v. collective liability of directors, and he discusses In re Emerging Communications, Inc. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:21 am by Adam Baker
Nota Bene Note 1: In obiter dicta Iacobucci J observed that the tender documents being considered in the case themselves illustrated the “rationale for the tendering process . . . to replace negotiation with competition” (para 41). [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The decision in Geoffrey Rush v Nationwide News, handed down today in Australia’s federal court, is the first – and so far, only – legal determination of a case associated with the #MeToo movement in Australia. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:56 am by Barry Eagar
                                                  Case: Food Channel Network v Television Food Network GP [2010] FCAFC 58Venue: Full Federal Court of AustraliaJudges: Keane CJ, Stone and Jagot JJConceptsIntent to Use - OnusOwnership of a trade markDeceptive SimilarityMain IssueIn opposition proceedings, does the evidentiary onus shift back to… [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 11:58 am
Aihara (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 377, 380 [appeal dismissed where debtors willfully refused to comply with trial court’s order that they respond to postjudgment interrogatories]; Stone v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:38 am
On Tuesday, December 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Rockwell International v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:12 am by MBettman
On April 9, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Visiting Nurse Association of Mid-Ohio v. [read post]