Search for: "Say v. Baker" Results 501 - 520 of 1,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2008, 11:49 am
Anyway, leading the decision of the Court (Lord Justice Pill, Lord Justice Scott Baker and Lord Justice Jacob), Jacob LJ had this to say:"Although Corus pleaded many more points originally, the Judge had to deal with what, by my count, were no less than 10 discrete points or sub-points. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:10 am
 Go on, spoil yourself and register here, says the IPKat. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Her aim was in part to engage Syria, as recommended by the Hamilton/Baker report, which does sound like the opposite of isolating Syria.) c) She was on a fact-finding mission. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm by John Elwood
We say “newish” because one of them is a returning relist that somehow slipped past us last week: Baston v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:36 pm by Rosalind English
 In Baker v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141, Dyson LJ, at paragraph 31, Sir John Dyson emphasised that the section 71(1) duty was not a duty to achieve the result of eliminating racial discrimination as such, or to promote equal opportunity, but a duty to have “due regard” to the need to achieve these goals. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 4:02 am by Lawrence Solum
 Since judicial authority consists of the power to "say what the law is" (Marbury v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:44 am by Lawrence Solum
Since judicial authority consists of the power to "say what the law is" (Marbury v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Say a supposed friend had offered his laptop to charge her phone, and he downloaded the images while she was in the bathroom. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:49 pm by Mark Walsh
The chief justice then says that Kennedy has the opinion in Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Lisa Grumet
In fact, Nevada specifically prohibits discrimination in “baker[ies]. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Then back in 1997 came Old Chief v. [read post]