Search for: "Seaman v. Seaman" Results 501 - 520 of 691
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2007, 1:24 am
NEW YORK COUNTYLandlord/Tenant Law Tenant Denied Summary Judgment; Despite Absence Of Lease, Still Required to Timely Pay Rent Seaman Arms LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 2:11 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKAdmiraltyShipping Firm Must Pay Injured Seaman Overtime As Part of His Entitlement to Maintenance, CurePadilla v. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 10:00 pm
The passenger boat, MV Kataline V, owned by San Nicolas Line, was carrying at least 73 people when it capsized after colliding with fishing boat Natalia, which was bound for Manila from Palawan. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 5:41 pm
Environmental Regulation, 58 EMORY L.J. 379 (2008) Lisa Heinzerling, Thrower Keynote Address: The Role of Science in Massachusetts v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
Justia highlights a case in which a seaman working on a boat suffers disabling neck injuries. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Nga Trinh Issue: Whether a person engaged in a maritime trade, who is not a seaman or a longshore worker, is a "seafarer" under Yamaha Motor Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
  Just days ago, the Court handed down its decision on this issue.In Atlantic Sounding Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 10:36 am by Alan Brackett
This has led the United States Supreme Court to accept maritime cases to settle disputes between the circuit courts, on issues such as seaman status, Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:09 am by Fred Goldsmith
Sept. 11, 2009), the plaintiff seaman was allowed, in the wake of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Atlantic Sounding Co. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This unambiguous written document constitutes documentary evidence that the attorney-client relationship between plaintiff and the Wallace defendants ended more than three years before plaintiff commenced this action (see Seaman v Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, 176 AD3d 538, 539 [1st Dept 2019]). [read post]