Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp" Results 501 - 520 of 4,125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2022, 7:17 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The top 10 employment discrimination settlements garnered $323.45 million in 2021, as compared to settlement figures of $422.68 in 2020 and $137.35 million in 2019, and the top 10 government enforcement action settlements garnered $146.38 million, a sharp decline from the 2020 total of $241 million, but a significant jump from the 2019 total of $57.52 million. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 3:36 am
Century and Harbor Freeway InterchangeAuthor Remi Jouan Licence CC BY-SA 3.0  Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Sir Geoffrey Vos MR, Dame Victoria Sharp, President, Lord Justice Bean) HRH the Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 1810 (2 Dec 2021)This was an appeal against the decisions of Mr Justice Warby in HRH The Duchess of Sussex v Associated [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
– Robert Sharp News, Strasbourg: Pal v UK, Arrest and prosecution of a journalist violated Article 10 Saint Piers, Free Speech Martyr – Paul Wragg [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
On 16 December 2021 Collins Rice J heard an application in the case of Spano v De Souza. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
In my recent post on the Malkiewicz v UK application, I noted two ideas for reducing exorbitant cost of defamation proceedings. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
The matter came on as an expedited hearing on 4 November 2021, before Dame Victoria Sharp, Lady Justice King and Lord Justice Warby. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Robert Sharp was the Head of Campaigns at English PEN from 2009-18, during which time he was one of the managers of the Libel Reform Campaign. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am by INFORRM
On 8 December 2021 Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the case of  Hwang v Kim [2021] EWHC 3327 (QB). [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
Rather, the First Amendment recognizes “a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials. [read post]