Search for: "Sharpe v. Light"
Results 501 - 520
of 765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2011, 3:54 pm
However, in 2005, in Illinois v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 3:06 pm
Ginsburg was sharp as a tack. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
Rptr. 170 (Feb. 2006), the presumption of reasonableness itself is a powerful argument for the reasonable doubt standard as a matter of Fifth Amendment law, especially in light of the Supreme Court's law on presumptions in criminal cases. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
In the light of this ruling (and one to much the same effect by Sharp J in Ecclestone v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm
Privacy and Data Protection In light of the implementation of the Data Protection Act 2018 and Brexit, the Hawktalk Blog highlights how the legislation is likely required to be subject to an adequacy decision by the EU. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolution statements since our last Round Up: 06462-21 Benwell v plymouthherald.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 9 Reporting of a crime (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 03211-21 Brown v The Courier, 1 Accuracy (2021) Breach – sanction: publication of correction 01887-21 Rahnama v The Mail on Sunday, 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation New Issued Cases There were 10 new… [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Last week, a Manhattan appellate panel in Antonini v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:34 am
At a minimum, a hearing would seem appropriate because of the sharp disagreement over the parties’ intent. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
W. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
" That is why a unanimous Supreme Court was able to declare, in the 1982 case of U.S. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 2:49 pm
Sharpe, citing Justice Cardozo in the 1937 American case of Palko v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 10:52 am
Just FYI.Hinkson v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 7:26 am
Romeo & Juliette Laser Hair Removal, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 10:46 am
Those two worlds, that of the discrete private dealer and the hurly-burly of the art world capital markets, came into sharp legal contrast in late December 2013 with the federal jury trial in Marguerite Hoffman v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 6:04 pm
The facts of Van Buren presented a perfect opportunity to shed light on that. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:30 am
Amongst others, lovers of all things copyright levies are probably looking forward to the decision in Case C-463/12 Copydan Båndkopi [on which see 1709 Blog post here], a reference for a preliminary ruling from apparent copyright-loving Member State Denmark, seeking clarification as to copyright levies and their calculation, including consideration of technological protection measures [on TPMs, see the recent decision in Case… [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:30 am
The case was Simpson v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 1:50 am
Today at 1:30 PM Pacific Time the United States District Court for the Northern District of California will hold an Apple v. [read post]
8 May 2021, 1:54 pm
Ohio, the Texas v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:18 pm
See Tibbs v. [read post]
