Search for: "Shell Trading (US) Company"
Results 501 - 520
of 775
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2012, 9:05 pm
In short, investors in this NASDAQ-listed company are likely holding worthless paper in a shell company. [read post]
20 May 2012, 6:49 pm
That they only suspended trading in companies that have no current information available. [read post]
20 May 2012, 3:00 am
To call this thesis speculation is to use too dignified a term. [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:59 am
Despite its notability, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that the shoe giant will pay $40,000,000 to settle charges over their ads being deceptive. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:45 pm
As noted below, yesterday the SEC suspended trading for 10 days in 379 shell companies which are non-reporting. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:46 pm
Now, however, because the trading suspension mandates that current financial formation must be provided, these shell companies can no longer be used by fraudsters to perpetuate their scams. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:09 pm
The SEC announced that it has suspended trading in the securities of 379 dormant companies. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:09 pm
The SEC announced that it has suspended trading in the securities of 379 dormant companies. [read post]
14 May 2012, 1:06 pm
The SEC suspended trading in the securities of 379 dormant companies because of concern that they could be hijacked by fraudsters and used to harm investors through reverse mergers or pump-and-dump schemes. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:35 am
This morning, the SEC announced a huge suspension in trading of 379 non-reporting shell companies, the largest suspension in the SEC’s history, according to their press release. [read post]
5 May 2012, 12:53 pm
As part of the SEC’s broad examination of investment company use of derivatives, Senator Carl Levin (D-MI) has urged the SEC to review the use of derivatives by some investment companies to engage in commodity trading through the securities markets in circumvention of restrictions in the federal tax code and in ways that eliminate oversight by the CFTC. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 11:08 am
For example, since a Form 10 shell does not do an IPO, post-merger it will be able to use the benefits accruing to an IPO in the first public offering it completes, but this will not be available for SPACs. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 4:13 am
In addition, newly created trading shells that are trading (ie those with a “business” that allows them to trade but they are marketed as shells) after December 8 will have to complete their IPO to start trading, which means that the benefits in the JOBS Act that are limited to the IPO will be used up and not be able to be used again post-merger. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
Murti, spotted in the company’s April 3 proxy. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Gorman in SEC Actions Chinese Accounts Frozen in SEC Zhongpin Insider-Trade Suit By Andrew Harris in Bloomberg Shells and shelves Making money by making companies: another industry that is globalising, consolidating and shifting east in the Economist When Red Flags Are Not Enough [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:34 am
It would also be great if the SEC would consider allowing all reporting companies, even on the OTCBB, to use S-3 if they are current in filings and have been public and not a shell for at least a year. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:26 pm
EGCs may use the scaled executive compensation disclosures currently permitted for smaller reporting companies. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:52 am
The announcement didn't say, but presumably they bypass seasoning because the technical language of the seasoning rule says that it only applies after a reverse merger with a US SEC-reporting shell company. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:10 pm
the Big 5, BP, Exxon, Shell, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips) and use those savings to extend for one year expiring energy tax provisions and reduce the deficit [See WIMS 3/27/12]. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:35 am
Definition of "reverse takeover" Under the amendments, a reverse takeover would be defined as: a transaction, whether effected by way of direct acquisition by the issuer or a subsidiary, an acquisition by a new holding company of the issuer or otherwise, of a business, a company or assets: where any percentage ratio as calculated using the class tests is 100% or more; or which in substance results in a fundamental change in the business or in a… [read post]
