Search for: "Shepard v. Shepard" Results 501 - 520 of 574
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2011, 2:08 pm by Jeff Sovern
  Here's the abstract: In May 2009, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
- Chancery Div rules in a trade secret case relating to technical information: Vestergaard Frandsen A/S and others v Bestnet Europe Ltd and others (IPKat) EWHC (Ch) finds actionable breach of confidence in case concerning stolen invoices: JN Dairies Ltd v Johal Dairies Ltd, Gurbir Singh (IPKat) Advertising Standards Authority condemns wrongful use of Volvo log by an unauthorised Volvo dealership (Class 46) Banksy – an unlikely copyright ambassador? [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 5:34 pm by Keith Rizzardi
Some bull trout are migratory, spawning in tributary streams where juvenile fish usually rear from one to four years before migrating to either a larger river (fluvial form) or lake (adfluvial form) where they spend their adult life, returning to the tributary stream to spawn (Fraley and Shepard 1989, p. 133). [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm by Steve Kalar
A slow week in the Ninth (for non-capital cases, at least), and an order amending the opinion, gives us an excuse to go back for a second pass at the interesting decision and sentencing issues in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 4:40 pm
., on the Merits at 5, Medimmune, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps considers Kavanaugh’s “sole opinion on the issue of choice, a 2017 dissent in Garza v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
We have been arguing that, under the Supreme Court opinions in Haley and Shepard, the Doctrine of Constitutional Avoidance must be applied to any application or extension of Almendarez-Torres, the case finding that an immigration statutory enhancement did not need to be pleaded in the indictment. [read post]