Search for: "Simon Appeal" Results 501 - 520 of 1,854
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2008, 1:58 pm
Secondly, the Court of Appeal judgment expressly approves the broad discretion of the Court under s.85 HA 1985 in Rogers Simon Brown LJ made the point that the court’s order reviving the secure tenancy could have been made subject to a condition that the tenant’s damages claim should not be pursued Hmm. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm by Dennis Crouch
Guest post by Ian McCarthy and Karen Ruckman, both from the Beedie School of Business, Simon Fraser University. [read post]
14 May 2014, 6:00 am by Simone Yoder
Simone can be reached at 504-595-3000 or syoder@mblb.com. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:25 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
“I would appeal to farmers to use our advisory and training services for health and safety to improve on-farm standards and practices,” he said. [read post]
17 May 2015, 5:45 pm by Christopher Simon
The Georgia dog attack attorneys at the Simon Law Firm have ample experience with Georgia law and can help you assess the viability of these and other types of negligence claims. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
On Monday 18 April 2016, the Court of Appeal (Jackson, King and Simon LJJ) will give judgment in the case of PJS v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 9:53 am by Amy Howe
Simon Tam describes himself as an “Asian-American musician, lecturer, and political activist. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 11:56 am
I'm glad the Court of Appeal (eventually) elected to publish this one. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 2:36 pm
Here's a round up of forensic news:Lawyers in a Chicago area murder case debated the reliability of blood-spatter evidence.An Oklahoma pathologist from the Medical Examiner's office testified in court about a report she submitted on autopsies that she did not actually conduct.The UK's Court of Appeal dismissed Simon Hall's appeal in a murder case. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 11:45 am by Giles Peaker
On the appeal to the Court of Appeal, the appeal was successful but damages only increased to £8,880, so Mr M still did not beat the Part 36 offer. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 10:14 am
 Merpel disagrees: it's not possible to separate law from policy on a matter as sensitive as this, she mewses.Some further readingEleonora's katpost of 17 April on the Supreme Court's decision to refer questions to the CJEU here Katpost reporting on the Baker & McKenziie debate on whether this case represents the end of browsing as we know it here Lionel Bently's assault on the Court of Appeal decision in this case, hosted on this weblog here Simon Clark's explanation of… [read post]