Search for: "Smith v State" Results 501 - 520 of 9,986
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2017, 5:20 pm by Aurora Barnes
Smith “did not hold that states must provide the same publicly funded benefits to all married persons,” regardless of whether their marriages are same-sex or opposite sex. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 2:49 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Veolia ES Nottinghamshire Ltd. v Nottinghamshire County Council [2009] EWHC 2382 (Admin) (01 October 2009) Anirah, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2009] EWHC 2363 (Admin) (01 October 2009) High Court (Chancery Division) Rawnsley & Anor v Weatherall Green & Smith North Ltd [2009] EWHC B22 (Ch) (30 September [...] [read post]
18 May 2009, 4:04 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) OT (A Child), Re [2009] EWCA Civ 409 (14 May 2009) Secretary of State for Defence v Smith, R (on the application of) [2009] EWCA Civ 441 (18 May 2009) Court of Appeal (Criminal Divison) Girma & Ors, R. v (Rev 1) [2009] EWCA Crim 912 (15 May 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Taylor v HMP [...] [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:42 pm
Her dissent, in toto, reads as follows: "While I understand joining the parade of courts to decide this issue, I would reverse for the reasons stated in Muniz v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:20 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
The Supreme Court hears argument Wednesday in Gunn v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 10:39 am by Paul Mark Sandler
(Part III of four parts) We return to the hypothetical case of Smith v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 1:46 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 7:33 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Buller (Iowa Department of Justice) has posted State v. [read post]