Search for: "Stand Up for California! v. California"
Results 501 - 520
of 3,416
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2014, 11:30 pm
For example, here, the Court declined to apply the Clayton Antitrust Act standing rules from Associated General Contractors of California v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 11:23 am
Sit-Up Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
Kesler, Kansas decision as to lack of authority of MERS; LaSalle Bank v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 6:59 am
Davidson v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 8:35 pm
In that case, EEOC v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 10:48 am
The case of Kayleigh McCall v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:26 am
Now, it will be up to the three-judge federal panel to decide whether, under the U.S. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:05 pm
The other, Coleman v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am
This morning the justices wrap up the February session with an oral argument in one of the marquee cases of the term, June Medical Services v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:51 am
Briefly: Maura Dolan and David Savage of the Los Angeles Times report that the lawyers who led the challenge to California’s Proposition 8 have been preparing state officials for the possibility that the Court could dismiss the case without deciding it on the merits; following up on that article, Rick Hasen suggests at his Election Law Blog that, “if the case is dismissed, then Judge Walker’s statewide injunction would stand. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 12:39 pm
A dissent in the California Supreme Court?! [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 3:59 pm
This important new decision is Creed-21 v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 3:48 pm
Citibank Court Dismisses Lawsuit Under Michigan Spam Statute Based on Preemption and Lack of Standing — Hafke v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 11:44 am
California disagrees.The panel opinion by Judge Collins holds that (1) the case isn't moot -- even though schools are no longer closed -- due to the "voluntary cessation" doctrine and the fact that schools might perhaps be closed again were COVID to flare back up; (2) the cessation of in-person instruction at public schools was fine, but (3) the order stopping in-person instruction at private schools was unconstitutional. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 2:06 pm
The case is People v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
Vathana v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 9:33 am
As the parties gear up for trial in Landis v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:53 am
In that case, the Court will consider the constitutionality of a California law banning the sale of violent video games to minors. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:00 am
U-Haul and Hall v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 2:24 pm
But in Cour v. [read post]
