Search for: "Standard Jury Instructions-Criminal Cases"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,719
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2018, 7:43 am
The post Court of Appeals Rules Pattern Jury Instruction Inadequate in Felony Indecent Exposure Case appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
"Yet, with Heller on the books, cases in Buzzard's flock furnish us with little instructive value. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 9:03 am
As the Court in Miller noted, in North Carolina, there is no pattern jury instruction that expressly addresses the defense of necessity. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am
His most well-known criminal case as a district-court judge was United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:55 am
The court agreed with the protester that the sidewalk is a public forum, subjecting the government’s efforts to restrict his speech to a more exacting standard of review. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:15 pm
He wrote, “The defendant has invited the court to jump into issues that have not been addressed by our Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals or the authors of (Nebraska Jury Instructions-Criminal 2nd Edition). [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:03 am
Other circuits expressly require juries to apply the "total mix" standard and, in those circuits, the petitioners' convictions would have been overturned. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:35 am
On the procedural side, the judicial system has a raft of procedures and procedural protections, including the grand jury, trial by jury with right of cross-examination, appeal, the right to notice and to be heard, and the requirement that reasons be provided for decisions. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:35 am
On the procedural side, the judicial system has a raft of procedures and procedural protections, including the grand jury, trial by jury with right of cross-examination, appeal, the right to notice and to be heard, and the requirement that reasons be provided for decisions. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 11:20 am
Because the defendant had not done so here, he had to meet a higher standard on appeal. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 11:20 am
Because the defendant had not done so here, he had to meet a higher standard on appeal. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:39 am
Flores-Ortega applies when a criminal defendant instructs his trial counsel to file a notice of appeal but trial counsel decides not to do so because the defendant’s plea agreement included an appeal waiver. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
Flores-Ortega applies when a criminal defendant instructs his trial counsel to file a notice of appeal but trial counsel decides not to do so because the defendant’s plea agreement included an appeal waiver. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:00 pm
The trial judge erred, however, by refusing to instruct the jury on defense of others as a defense to the crime of affray, the underlying act for involuntary manslaughter in the case. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 5:31 pm
It contained statutes and jury instructions. [read post]
30 May 2018, 2:49 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s judgment and instruct that court to remand the case to the district court with directions to dismiss all claims for prospective relief regarding pregnant unaccompanied minors. [read post]
30 May 2018, 2:03 pm
If we hold, as the court apparently does, that one implication of the existence of such precise, independent standards is that juries must be instructed to find facts according to those standards, we raise the spectre of requiring trial judges in defamation cases to instruct juries as to four separate and distinct burdens of proof, falling variously on the plaintiff and defendant. [read post]
30 May 2018, 1:31 pm
If we hold, as the court apparently does, that one implication of the existence of such precise, independent standards is that juries must be instructed to find facts according to those standards, we raise the spectre of requiring trial judges in defamation cases to instruct juries as to four separate and distinct burdens of proof, falling variously on the plaintiff and defendant. [read post]
30 May 2018, 9:19 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s judgment and instruct that court to remand the case to the district court with directions to dismiss all claims for prospective relief regarding pregnant unaccompanied minors. [read post]
25 May 2018, 11:00 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s judgment and instruct that court to remand the case to the district court with directions to dismiss all claims for prospective relief regarding pregnant unaccompanied minors. [read post]