Search for: "Stanford Law Review" Results 501 - 520 of 3,995
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2019, 11:36 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Eve Brensike Primus (University of Michigan Law School) has posted Disaggregating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Doctrine: Four Forms of Constitutional Ineffectiveness (Stanford Law Review, Vol. 72, 2020) on SSRN. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 10:04 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Schall (Vanderbilt University), and Rene Marois (Vanderbilt University) have posted Brain Imaging for Legal Thinkers: A Guide for the Perplexed (Stanford Technology Law Review, Symposium Issue:... [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 3:03 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Melissa Hamilton (University of Houston Law Center) has posted The Reliability of Assault Victims’ Immediate Accounts: Evidence from Trauma Studies (Stanford Law & Policy Review, Vol. 26, 2015, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:00 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Kolber (Brooklyn Law School) has posted Not-So-Smart Blockchain Contracts and Artificial Responsibility (Stanford Technology Law Review, 2018) on SSRN. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 8:39 am by Media Law Prof
Marvin Ammori, Stanford Law School, Center for Internet & Society; New America Foundation, Open Technology Initiative, and Luke Pelican, have published Media Diversity and Online Advertising in volume 76 of the Albany Law Review (2012/2013). [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Also, checkers don't evaluate the truth of cited material, as evidenced by the Stanford Law Review publishing an article in 2005 stating that Gary Boone invented the integrated circuit. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Li (Stanford Law School) has posted Due Process in Removal Proceedings After Thuraissigiam (Stanford Law Review, Vol. 74, 2022) on SSRN. [read post]
17 May 2004, 8:05 am
According to the Boston Business Journal, a Stanford Law School study reveals that federal securities class [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm by Legal Aggregate
Stanford Law Professor Bernadette MeylerBernadette Meyler, JD ’03, Carl and Sheila Spaeth Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Research and Intellectual Life The legacy of Justice O’Connor was a powerful force for students involved in the Stanford Law Review when I was a member. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 9:10 pm
Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:01 am by Ezra Rosser
 The issue is structured as an article by Richard Sander–best known for his earlier attack on Affirmative Action published by Stanford Law Review–followed by responses. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 8:52 pm by Patent Docs
January 21, 2011 - Patents, Innovation and Job Creation: A Virtuous Circle (Innovation Alliance) - Washington, DC January 25, 2011 - Understanding Obviousness in a Post-KSR World: Practical Applications for Compliance with the Recent USPTO Guidelines (Technology Transfer Tactics) - 1:00 - 2:30 PM (EST) January 26-27, 2011 - The Life Sciences Lawyer's Guide to Patent Term Adjustment and Patent Term Extensions*** (American Conference Institute) - New York, NY January 28-29, 2011 - The Future of… [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 3:59 am
That would be a good business card for Ed, I thought, pretty well summing up what Blawg Review is all about. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 11:30 am
McDonald, Professor of Law and Faculty Symposium AdvisorAlice Anderson,  Law Review Symposium  Editor [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:20 am
Sunstein (University of Chicago Law School and University of Chicago - Law School) have posted On Learning from Others (Stanford Law Review, Vol. 59, No. 5, 2007) on SSRN. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 3:41 am
Allen Stanford, Marc Dreier, Bernie Madoff, Tom Petters...More than a few cases these days are at or near the intersection of criminal law and bankruptcy law and the U.S. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 11:10 am by James Hamilton
  In fact, the claimed investments did not exist, and the bank had to use new CD sales proceeds to make interest and redemption payments on pre-existing CDs.After the fraud was discovered, two groups of Louisiana investors filed suits in state court against a number of Stanford companies and employees claiming violations of Louisiana law. [read post]