Search for: "State Court District 1" Results 501 - 520 of 48,525
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2019, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
However, the state supreme court found that the district court’s jury instructions adequately encompassed T.D. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 2:24 pm by Stan Gibson
” The district court found that this was insufficient because it is inadmissible hearsay. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on May 10, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., LINDLEY, BANNISTER, OGDEN, AND DELCONTE, JJ. 970 CA 22-01908 [*1]AL 557 DOE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v CENTRAL VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, FORMERLY KNOWN AS ILION CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, CENTRAL VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS ILION CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT… [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on May 10, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., LINDLEY, BANNISTER, OGDEN, AND DELCONTE, JJ. 970 CA 22-01908 [*1]AL 557 DOE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v CENTRAL VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, FORMERLY KNOWN AS ILION CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, CENTRAL VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS ILION CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT… [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Historically, Hispanic children were segregated from Anglo children in many public school districts in the southwestern states. [read post]
., the United States District Court for the District of Delaware recently granted both the Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ requests to stay the litigation, but denied the Plaintiffs’ additional request to toll the statutory 30-month stay under 21 U.S.C. [read post]
., the United States District Court for the District of Delaware recently granted both the Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ requests to stay the litigation, but denied the Plaintiffs’ additional request to toll the statutory 30-month stay under 21 U.S.C. [read post]
., the United States District Court for the District of Delaware recently granted both the Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ requests to stay the litigation, but denied the Plaintiffs’ additional request to toll the statutory 30-month stay under 21 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 7:13 am by Victoria VanBuren
by Jeremy Clare The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania denied a motion for reconsideration of the court’s order compelling arbitration because plaintiffs failed to establish a change in controlling law. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 12:02 pm by vera
In a closely watched case, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has issued an order that should see many more patent cases leaving the Eastern District of Texas. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 6:35 pm by Idaho State Police
IDAHO STATE POLICE NEWS RELEASE - generated by our News Release ListServer DO NOT REPLY --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IDAHO STATE POLICE NEWS RELEASE District 1 Patrol 615 West Wilbur Ave. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 12:38 pm
Effective September 1, 2007, the United States District Court for the District of Vermont amended its Local Rules to address the discovery of electronically stored information (“ESI”). [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:06 pm
District court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania held the company failed to state a claim. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:11 am by Gregory B. Williams
By Order issued by Chief Judge Stark, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware announced that it is hosting its biennial District of Delaware Bench and Bar Conference on April 30 and May 1, 2020. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:11 am by Gregory B. Williams
By Order issued by Chief Judge Stark, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware announced that it is hosting its biennial District of Delaware Bench and Bar Conference on April 30 and May 1, 2020. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
" P.R. 3-1(d) states that the infringement contentions must disclose"[w]hether each element of each asserted claim is claimed to be literally present or present under the doctrine of equivalents in the Accused Instrumentality. [read post]