Search for: "State of Montana v. United States" Results 501 - 520 of 1,059
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am by New York Criminal Defense
 We know that to be constitutional, presumptions must be permissive, not mandatory (Sandstrom v Montana, 442 US 510 [1979]). [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:51 pm by David Miller
Matt Salmon (R) recently introduced a bill (pdf) that would remove several western states from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and move them to a proposed, to-be-created Twelfth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 4:14 pm by Lyle Denniston
United States — Retroactivity of the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 12:48 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
 We’re talking about the jurisdiction of the United States as well. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:31 pm by Lyle Denniston
 A majority of the Justices joined in the critique, most strongly expressed in 2014 in Harris v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 7:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Dept. of Justice: Crow Allottees Cert Petition Question presented: Can the water rights owned by individual Crow Indian allottees – which this Court in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:22 pm by Ed Gehres
Goldstein began the argument noting that even if tribal governments had clear but limited legislative authority, as described in Montana v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 3:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Both counsel for the tribe and the United States hit this point very effectively. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:45 pm by Ed Gehres
Bay Mills Indian Community was significantly more supportive of the historical view of tribal sovereignty urged by the tribe and the United States in this case. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 9:45 am by Bill Otis
  With all we hear about the need to respect other countries and other value systems, these harsh though widely used alternatives to prison never seem to get brought up in the discussion of the supposed moral shortcomings of the incarceration-happy United States. [read post]