Search for: "State of Oregon Senate" Results 501 - 520 of 1,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Finance National: “Digital Currencies Flow to Campaigns, but State Rules Vary” by Andrew Selsky and Steve LeBlanc (Associated Press) for WHYY Connecticut: “A CT State Senator’s Trial on Charges of Campaign Finance Fraud Is Delayed Indefinitely by Evidence Dispute” by Edmund Mahoney (Hartford Courant) for Yahoo News New York: “Donors to Pro-Adams’ Political Action Committee Have Sizable Investments in Evolv Technologies, a… [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 7:44 am by David Kravets
Holton, the Oregon U.S. attorney, said in a statement. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:00 am by Edward Piper
 Governor Kitzhaber signed the legislation (Senate Bill 1) in March 2013, and it took effect immediately. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:11 am by Ray Mullman
The Oregon Health Care Association is the main lobbying group for the for-profit long-term care industry in Oregon. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:44 pm
"We have improvements to make and were trying to make them," said Larry George, a state senator and co-owner of George Packing Co. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:44 pm
"We have improvements to make and were trying to make them," said Larry George, a state senator and co-owner of George Packing Co. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:21 am by Jim Sedor
Lobbying California: “California Senate OKs Scaled-Down Travel Disclosure Bill” by Judy Lin (Associated Press) for Santa Cruz Sentinel California: “Law Students Propose Bill to Close Lucrative Capitol Lobbying Loophole” by Melanie Mason for Los Angeles Times Hawaii: “Antiquated Law Spares Lobbyists in Honolulu Ethics Scandal” by Nick Grube for Honolulu Civil Beat New Jersey: “ELEC Report Reveals Healthcare Most Heavily Lobbied Sector in New… [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:52 am
We still have three state senators vying for the post, which I believe currently pays a princely $72,000 a year: Kate Brown, Rick Metsger, and Vicki Walker. [read post]
12 May 2017, 5:30 am by Kevin
That is true in almost every state, of course, and Oregon is no exception. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 5:51 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  According to the web site of the National Conference of State Legislatures, 15 jurisdictions provide such exemptions(California, Connecticut, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota and Virginia.) [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 4:01 am by Jack Bogdanski
Despite clear public sentiment in favor of recriminalizing possession of hard street drugs in Oregon, the bobbleheads in the state legislature have only just begun hemming and hawing about it.Yesterday two prominent state senators continued to downplay and deny the obvious need to get the criminal justice system back involved in battling the drug addiction that's destroying lives and the state's cities, especially Portland. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 5:45 am by Allison Mollenkamp
At I&A, the report says, Jan. 6 came in the midst of a “pendulum swing” after the racial justice protests of 2020, including in Portland, Oregon. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 9:23 pm by TSLP
(Four states were implicitly exempted from PASPA: Nevada, Montana, Oregon and Delaware.)Will this litigation test the issue? [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:20 pm by J. Gordon Hylton
  However, the 1859 admission of Oregon (whose state constitution prohibited both slavery and settlement by free African-Americans) and the adoption of an anti-slavery constitution by the Kansas Territory in 1859, created an even larger free state majority in the Senate. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 11:55 am
State Senator Rick Metsger from East County is making a big issue out of it, and he's backed up legally by the state's legislative counsel. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As to interstate federalism, some states (and their representatives in DC) might be reluctant to reduce their current relative voice in the federal government (especially in the Senate), a consequence that would result from increasing California’s share in the Senate from 2% (2 out of 100) to 6% (6 out of 104, because three states new states would mean replacing California’s two existing senators with six new ones pursuant to the… [read post]