Search for: "State v Monroe"
Results 501 - 520
of 776
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2014, 4:13 pm
In Riley v County of Broome, Section 1104 was put in place in 1957 as part of what is now title VII of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, which was intended to create a uniform set of traffic regulations, or the rules of the road to update and replace the former traffic regulations, and bring them into conformance with the Uniform Vehicle Code adopted in other states. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Once again, a Justice Dollinger opinion, here in Messsinger v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:45 pm
Div. 1957), Innes v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm
La. 2010); Gelber v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:15 pm
County of Monroe, and asking what they were doing to avoid liability by complying with that decision. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 4:36 am
Kassab v Kasab is a perfect example. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 4:36 am
Kassab v Kasab is a perfect example. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:46 am
The California Court of Appeals in People v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
Roberson v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:28 pm
In the Martinez case, Monroe Community College first confronted the question, made the wrong decision, was sued, and lost in court [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 12:22 am
But Justices Brennan and Marshall relentlessly dissented in every death penalty case, and Justice John Marshall Harlan was the lone dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:21 am
Muskrat v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 7:25 am
In State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 7:25 am
In State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
Caplash When we last visited this case, Monroe County Commercial Division Justice Kenneth R. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 5:26 pm
As decided in Carter v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:08 am
Shibley gets in some law, such as Davis v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
As Bloomberg reports, those state AGs “stumbled upon Doughty in 2021 in challenging a moratorium on oil and gas leasing and then sought him out specifically by shopping cases to him in the Monroe Division of the Western District. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 3:28 am
Ct., Monroe County 2004] ), such a withdrawal does mandate a dissolution unless it is found that “it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the business” (Horning v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:03 pm
People v. [read post]
