Search for: "State v. A. L. B." Results 501 - 520 of 6,570
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm by Josh Blackman
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 5:49 am by Victoria VanBuren
  United States Anti-Doping Agency, Protocol for Olympic and Paralympic Movement Testing § 13 (2009) [hereinafter USADA Protocol]. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm
  The compensation amount under Section 1.61 21(f)(5)(iii) remains unchanged at $215,000.The Code provides that the $1,000,000,000 threshold used to determine whether a multiemployer plan is a systematically important plan under section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(aa) is adjusted using the cost-of-living adjustment provided under Section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(bb). [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:51 pm by Marta Requejo
L., for payment of flat-rate compensation for private copying in respect of storage media, marketed by it during a precisely defined period. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 12:17 pm
  The legal requirements are Section 503(b-k) of Act 45, 403.102 of the UCC Regulation, both available at PA L&I website. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:47 am by tracey
Supreme Court The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council [2012] UKSC 34 (18 July 2012) Munir & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 32 (18 July 2012) Alvi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 33 (18 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Horn & Ors v Commercial Acceptances Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 958 (19 July 2012)… [read post]