Search for: "State v. Arnold"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,387
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th Dept 2006]). [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
Saucier v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:02 am
Arnold, JudgeRepresenting Appellant: William G. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:39 am
First up is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:41 am
Supreme Court in Miller v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:16 am
Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration ordecision of this motion.06-713 ) WASHINGTON STATE GRANGE V. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
No muesli mix-up likely in the world where rabbits reignSupreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch) is another blockbuster judgment from Mr Justice Arnold in the High Court, Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 5:29 am
The limitation period had expired.Madam Justice Arnold-Bailey disagreed. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:38 pm
ARNOLD and TINA ARNOLD, Appellants, v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:52 am
As you would expect if you read the title or had analyzed the trends of when we post about food cases, Arnold v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
These were two of the key questions which the Court of Appeal grappled with in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents [2021] EWCA Civ 1374. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 1:22 am
United States v Arnold Decision (2006) In the NY Times story "Searching a computer", said Jennifer M. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:44 am
An English version of the decision, couresy of Arnold Ruess, can be found here . [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 7:49 am
The ECJ answered negatively, stating categorically that copyright does not protect functional elements. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am
In line with Lord Justice Jacob’s point in Actavis v Merck, the Court of Appeal stated that – in certain circumstances – there is nothing inventive about routinely-taken steps even if the actual outcome had not been predicted. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:58 pm
Arnold LJ Arnold LJ also summarised t [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
Some grand IP ideas popped up in Neil's mind, after General Electric company to move its headquarters from the New York suburbs in Fairfield, Connecticut to Boston, in the near-by state of Massachusetts. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 5:00 pm
In Preston v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:11 am
Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas affirmed that decision last month. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:49 am
Advocate General Szpunar, in his opinion in Hauck, states at the referred to passage (emphasis added):99. [read post]
