Search for: "State v. Austria"
Results 501 - 520
of 701
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2011, 10:59 pm
H. and Others v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
529/07 Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH, also known as the "Easter bunnies' case", which was a reference for a preliminary ruling from Austria on the question of how to establish bad faith in trade mark invalidity proceedings. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:00 am
Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics (Pharma Patents) US: CAFC Affirms district court de novo review in section 146 action: Streck v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am
No. 337-TA-655: TianRui v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 45 – read judgment. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:45 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Home Box Office v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm
In Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:27 am
As for Article 3 (prohibition from torture or inhuman or degrading treatment), the European Court of Human Rights in Herczegfalvy v Austria (1992) 15 EHRR 437 at [82] stated that ‘as a general rule, a measure which is a therapeutic necessity cannot be regarded as inhuman or degrading’, although of course the court must be satisfied that the treatment is indeed medically necessary. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 5:32 am
Austria (2003) ). [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:30 pm
Khan v. the United Kingdom and Onur v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:02 am
In Wood v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 7:50 am
A.A. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 1:17 am
The FCO also referred to another prisoner voting case, Frodl v Austria (see my post), which “in the Government’s view, is inconsistent with Hirst”. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:54 am
Rosenfeld v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:54 am
Rosenfeld v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:33 am
: AMP v USPTO (Patent Docs) US: WFU law professor says Federal Circuit failed as “keeper of the Constitution” in AMP v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:37 pm
Dep’t of Revenue of the State of WashingtonDocket: 10-1289Issue(s): (1) Whether this Court's holding in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am
AUSTRIA – 30141/04 [2010] ECHR 1996 (22 November 2010): 2010 decision of Euro court that states not obligated to allow for gay marriage becomes final. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:02 am
Furthermore, the GRAG draws support for the ECHR decision of Parry v UK to argue that it is within the margin of appreciation afforded to states on this issue to exclude married applicants from recognition. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:09 am
The meaning of “determination of his civil rights” was considered by the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) in Ringeisen v Austria (No 1) (1971) 1 EHRR 455. [read post]
