Search for: "State v. Back" Results 501 - 520 of 46,057
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 8:35 am by Amy Howe
In November 2020, the court sent the case back to the 5th Circuit with instructions to seek guidance from the Louisiana Supreme Court on whether state law would in fact allow Mckesson to be held liable. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:24 am by Ezra Rosser
This Article argues that the generally accepted understanding of Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs allege that when Ellen stepped back from active operations of the Diner, Kenneth began looting the Diner. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm by Ilya Somin
However, the Court chose not to deal with that question, which will now be remanded back to the California state courts for their consideration. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by Josh Blackman
While States have substantial authority to regulate land use, see Village of Euclid v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:56 am by Amy Howe
California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Lawmakers there are considering a proposal (backed by Republican candidate Donald Trump) to alter the way the state allocates electors based on the November election results in the state. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 5:59 pm by Jason Rantanen
The Federal Circuit in Brumfield pushed back on foreseeability as being the sole, sufficient criterion for proximate cause. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:49 pm by Michael Oykhman
” In R v D(J) the court states that for the charge to be made out, the breach of peace must “flow from the manner in which possession of the real property is taken and not from subsequent events. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 2:01 pm
So back to state court you go.That all seems right to me, for the exact reasons Judge Callahan articulates. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 11:48 am by NARF
The Land Buy-Back Program for Tribal Nations (2012-2022). [read post]