Search for: "State v. Belt"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2018, 8:56 am
Don’t tell me this is all to protect the EPO against terrorists – it is a laughable proposition that the current “security checks” might intimidate, let alone stop a bunch of terrorists with machine guns or explosive belts. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:47 am
Supreme Court ruling, in the landmark case of Massachusetts v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am
Stated differently, an accident is "a sudden, unexpected event that was not a risk inherent in the work performed" (Matter of Kowal v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 1124, 1125 [2018]; Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, 678, 682, 684-685 [2018]). [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am
Stated differently, an accident is "a sudden, unexpected event that was not a risk inherent in the work performed" (Matter of Kowal v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 1124, 1125 [2018]; Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, 678, 682, 684-685 [2018]). [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:54 am
Lenox on the Lake, South Florida Injury Lawyer Blawg, May 20, 2015 The Seat Belt Defense in Florida Accident Cases – Jones v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Paramedics with Waterloo Fire Rescue took her to Covenant Medical Center, the accident report states. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 5:39 pm
Packages move along a conveyor belt at the United Parcel Service Inc. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 1:15 pm
US v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:51 am
In the case, O’Neal v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 11:55 am
See Dean v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 4:14 pm
” Tweeter and the Monkey Man, Traveling Wilburys (Bob Dylan).United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 4:46 am
A recent take on this comes in Russo v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
In Severino v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:10 am
Unsurprisingly, in my view, in the light of Lord Justice Nichols famous dictum in Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset [1989] 1 Ch 350 (a case with many similar features): "There was, I repeat, physical presence on the property by the wife and her agent of the nature, and to the extent, that one would expect of an occupier having regard to the then state of the property: namely, the presence involved in actually carrying out the renovation necessary to make the house fit for residential… [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:10 am
Unsurprisingly, in my view, in the light of Lord Justice Nichols famous dictum in Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset [1989] 1 Ch 350 (a case with many similar features): "There was, I repeat, physical presence on the property by the wife and her agent of the nature, and to the extent, that one would expect of an occupier having regard to the then state of the property: namely, the presence involved in actually carrying out the renovation necessary to make the house fit for residential… [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
In a previous 2000 case, Geier v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:30 pm
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. arose from an injury to a twelve-year old boy who tried to jump aboard a slow-moving freight train. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 4:30 am
Analyzing the factors set forth in South Carolina Pipeline Corp. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:58 am
To " negate coverage by virtue of an exclusion, an insurer must establish that the exclusion is stated in clear and unmistakable language, is subject to no other reasonable interpretation, and applies in the particular case'" (Belt Painting Corp. v TIG Ins. [read post]
