Search for: "State v. Black"
Results 501 - 520
of 10,079
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
" This provision was, of course, enacted in response to the notorious passages in the 1857 Dred Scott ruling, which held that blacks could not be citizens of the United States. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 4:34 am
Geiger doesn't like transgender people and is using her religion and the Supreme Court's decision in 303 Creative v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 4:38 pm
The lawsuit, Randle v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 7:02 am
It can double as an all-expenses-paid trip (Brian Slodysko, The Associated Press) The Supreme Court Case That Has Me Worried, for Survivors and for My State (Kathy Hochul, The New York Times) Senate Democrats announce vote to advance Supreme Court ethics bill (Sahil Kapur & Frank Thorp V, NBC News) Neither party can count on the Supreme Court to be its ally (Mitch McConnell, The Washington Post) Supreme Court Affirmative Action Ruling Harms Black UNC Students Like Me… [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 4:19 am
In a 2-1 decision, the Fourth Circuit in Porter v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
Dep’t of State, the D.C. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
From DeHart v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
The Guardian and BBC also report a demonstration at the Osbourne-Rogers wedding which Just Stop Oil has stated was not organised by them. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 10:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 11:41 pm
A Matter of Perspective As another example, consider Steinberg v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
But in any event, it is black-letter law that such a move does not relieve the Court of its constitutional duty to satisfy itself that the plaintiff is presenting a justiciable case or controversy to be resolved. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:06 am
“Expect a shock,” said Michael V. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Biden v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:26 pm
But few condemn United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 11:28 am
The Court reaffirmed this “max-blacks” requirement in the Alabama voting rights case two weeks ago. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
From State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 1:38 pm
Since the founding of America, the United States has ratified 27 amendments to the Constitution. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am
California’s Proposition 209 provides a tangible example of the impact that banning affirmative action had on state schools: According to a 2020 study, enrollment among Black and Latino students at UC Berkely and UCLA dropped significantly two years after Prop 209’s ban on affirmative action. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:59 am
The Court's rationale is that the website designer has a free speech right to reject the State of Colorado's compelled speech that she disagrees with.The case is 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
