Search for: "State v. Borough" Results 501 - 520 of 1,315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act; Drunk Driving; Wrongful Death)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlCosentino v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Thorpe Petition and Appendix (00059355) Question presented: The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) applies to “any” institution or state or local government agency that receives federal funds and “has possession of, or control over,” Native American human remains. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:22 am by Amy Knight, Arden Chambers
The House of Lords considered the effect of s 17(1) in Din (Taj) v Wandsworth LBC [1983] 1 AC 657, HL. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:11 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Upon considering the rule in Din v Wandsworth London Borough Council [1983] 1 AC 657, Lord Reed reasoned that the review officer did not consider whether the cause of the appellant’s current state of homelessness was her surrender of her tenancy at the hostel. [read post]
18 May 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Haile v London Borough of Waltham Forest, heard 29 January. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:31 pm
KQED, Inc., 438 U.S. 1, 11 (1978) (stating that “[t]here is an undoubted right to gather news ‘from any source by means within the law’” (quoting Branzburg v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:59 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
In Mohammed v Manek and Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (1995) 27 HLR 439, it was held that, as a general rule, accommodation made available for an applicant pending enquiries as to what (if any) duty was owed to him under Pt 7, Housing Act 1996, was not within the scope of s 3, so that an authority do not have to obtain a possession order before evicting an applicant. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
Hotak (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Kanu (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Johnson (Appellant) v Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (Respondent)Crisis & Shelter, EHRC, SS for CLG interveners [2015] UKSC 30 The thing about the Supreme Court is that all those years of accrued, encrusted High Court and Court of Appeal case law just don’t matter. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:50 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Enter the entertaining case of Williamson v Khan. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:25 pm by Giles Peaker
Urban Lettings (London) Ltd v London Borough Of Haringey [2015] UKUT 104 (LC) What does an ‘appropriate person’ ‘having control of a HMO’ mean in circumstances where not all of the property making up the HMO is demised to one landlord? [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 1:12 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:03 am by INFORRM
Presenters often appear to be ill-briefed and insufficiently armed with the facts necessary to challenge assertions made by interviewees in live interviews, reflecting not just pressure on them but a lack of understanding by programme researchers and producers He also pointed to ‘evidence of a misunderstanding of the political process in the EU’, drawing attention in particular to written evidence submitted by the Labour Party which stated that ‘too often it seems that… [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]