Search for: "State v. Brake" Results 501 - 520 of 959
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm by John Elwood
  The relevant state statute quaintly requires vehicles to have “a stop lamp,” and no North Carolina court has ever held that the law requires two working brake lights, but the officer stopped the men because of the nonfunctioning light. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 2:35 pm by David Russcol
But under North Carolina law, the State Court of Appeals held, only one working brake light was required, and the car had a working brake light. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 12:22 am by Abhik Majumdar
State of MP ((1996) 6 SCC 129), perhaps a brief backgrounder to the legal provisions involved is necessary. [read post]
25 May 2021, 7:17 am by Don Asher
 It has been defined as “… one of the most common causes of serious traffic accidents involving tractor-semitrailer combinations,” caused by issues of braking and the loss of yaw stability resulting in the trailer (or double) swinging out of sync and toward the tractor itself, forming a “V” shape in the roadway. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The same court had earlier rejected evidence of foreign standards concerning press brakes in Buzzell v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 9:17 pm
The driver of the car, a 44-year-old male, allegedly drove the wrong way on an off-ramp to State Route 60 in Glen Avon and struck the bus, which was transporting seven students. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 12:06 am by Moseley Collins
Hill or other physicians, Mrs Smith's actions become a superceding cause and brake in the causation chain. [read post]