Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 501 - 520
of 22,109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2010, 2:32 pm
Of State Ins Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 6:44 am
This week, the United States Supreme Court decided whether a state can require a voter to present a photo ID before casting a ballot (Crawford v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
When prosecutors ask "were-they-lying" questions, especially when they ask them of a defendant, they, almost always, will risk reversal.Once error is established, the burden is on the State to show that it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:01 am
State v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 11:56 am
Nash v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 2:44 am
In Thornton v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:47 am
In Bacchus Imports, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:34 am
While states may not impose undue burdens on interstate commerce, the constitution does not prohibit taxation of activities having “substantial nexus with the taxing State” that are non-discriminatory, fairly apportioned, and related to services provided by the state. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/17-494_j4el.pdf [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 7:03 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 8:28 am
In Church of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:11 am
Supreme Court handed down its decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
Removing a tenured State or municipal employee claimed to have abandonment the position from service
10 Feb 2023, 9:50 am
New York State Civil Service Rule 4 NYCRR 5.3(d), since repealed, permitted the appointing authority of a State department or agency employee to terminate a tenured employee in the Classified Service absent for a period of ten or more days without an explanation by deeming the employee to have resigned from his or her position. [read post]
Removing a tenured State or municipal employee claimed to have abandonment the position from service
10 Feb 2023, 9:50 am
New York State Civil Service Rule 4 NYCRR 5.3(d), since repealed, permitted the appointing authority of a State department or agency employee to terminate a tenured employee in the Classified Service absent for a period of ten or more days without an explanation by deeming the employee to have resigned from his or her position. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 11:56 am
But in states where analysts have to testify, the burden is easily manageable. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:27 am
"Application of AEDPA to Review of State Determinations of Fact (Wood v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:36 pm
Hawley v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 3:55 am
Compare United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:22 pm
Clark v. [read post]
New Mexico COA Affirms State Conviction of Navajo Member for Crime on Navajo Fee Land (Baca Chapter)
13 Aug 2012, 5:31 am
Here is the opinion in State v. [read post]
